Home | News | Site Map | Search | Contact

“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

-James Madison

 

The Lost Horizons News

Mid-Edition Update for July 4, 2016

 

Please Start Here

 

My Vote For Scalia's Seat: Alex Kozinski Of The Ninth Circuit

Featured In This Update:

It's Declaration Day. Are You Going To Do It?

***

A Letter To My Congressman

***

A Great New Outreach Tool From ChFC Tom Bottaro

***

Regarding "Astroturf" And Trolls

***

WANTED! Your Articles!!

***

Watching The Watchmen- Updated

***

Updates on Doreen's case can be found here.

And Don't Miss These:

Regarding State Group Membership

***

The Educated American's Tax Filing Flow Chart

***

Why Are You Not Doing This?

***

Project Paradigm-Shift

***

Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

***

A "Pragmatic" Perspective On The Tax And The Rule Of Law

***

Illuminating Anniversaries For This Week

***

Your Comments

***

...and much, much more!

 

Hot Topics In The News:

 

The Fourteenth Edition of CtC is Now Available!

On Obamacare

And Hey! Don't miss the great stuff in the main page of this edition!

*****

"The preservation of a free government requires, not merely that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained, but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great barrier which defends the rights of the people. The rulers who are guilty of such encroachment exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are TYRANTS. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them and are slaves….."

-James Madison

 

So, Today Is "Declaration Day"

That is,

  • "NO MORE PARALYSIS Day"

  • "NO MORE DENIAL Day"

  • "NO MORE, "I DON'T DARE..." Day"

  • "NO MORE, "THE BAD MEN WILL NOTICE ME SO I'D BETTER NOT!" Day"

  • "NO MORE, "I'LL WAIT FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO GO FIRST..." Day"

In short, today is,

  • "GET OFF YOUR ASS Day"

  • "GET LOUD AND PROUD AND UN-COWED Day"

It's,

  • "DON'T STOP 'TIL YOU'VE GOT LIBERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW Day"

  • "FACE THE FACTS Day"

  • "NO TIME TO RELAX Day"...

More than anything, today is "PUT ASIDE DELUSIONS Day" That's what the original "Declaration day" was all about. It was the day the American colonists finally acknowledged that the people they had been entreating to respect their rights actually didn't want them to have their rights.

It was the day the American colonists finally acknowledged that the government operatives they had been petitioning and politicking and lobbying and arguing with weren't misled or mistaken or suffering from misunderstanding, needing only to have things explained a bit better, or argued a bit more authoritatively. Instead, as the colonists realized and finally admitted by way of the Declaration, those operatives were their competitors. Those operatives were the colonists' opponents. Efforts to persuade them were pointless-- they admitted to no limits on their power and had no interest in curbing its abuse, which was being practiced for their benefit.

IT WAS HARD for the colonists to reach that epiphany about their government. Because states exercise power (and partly also because they maintain an elaborate apologia dedicated to justifying that exercise as being for the good of the citizenry, or at least the way things must or are supposed to be), they come to be viewed as virtual parents in the hind-brains of those subject to that power. It is very hard for people to recognize and acknowledge that actual Mom and Dad are bad people. It is nearly as hard for people to recognize that the state under the influence of which they have been raised is corrupt and malicious.

But of course, sometimes Mom and Dad are indeed bad, and states usually are. And while Mom and Dad can and often do become remorseful, and proceed to reform and redemption, states are institutionally-incapable of remorse. The only remedy against a bad state is taking away its power. Eventually, after wasting all that time and effort on petitioning, politicking, lobbying and arguing, the American colonists admitted this truth on Declaration Day and said, "No more talking-- it's time for walking!"

Bless them for abandoning their child-like view of the state and becoming grown-ups at last.

TODAY, LET'S SEE if we modern Americans are equally deserving of blessings. We should be up to the task; after all, we have a much easier row to hoe than the colonists did.

While we, too, must adopt a grown-up understanding of the true character of the dangerous servant against which we have been wisely warned, our state is already bound down by the written law, thanks to the blood and sacrifices of our ancestors. All we have to do is recognize that the state is constantly struggling to escape any limitations placed upon it by that law, and to suppress and marginalize anyone revealing its bad behavior and anything showing how it can be put back into its chains.

Particularly, we have to recognize that the biggest and most important limitation put upon the state concerns its ability to take resources from individual citizens for its own use. It's this simple-- the one who controls the disposition of property is the one in charge.

Because it is so important, for decades the United States has been engaged in the cultivation and exploitation of myths about what limitations are placed upon it in regard to resource acquisition. Sadly, for most of those decades most Americans have fallen for the fictions.

Chief among these state-serving, people-harming myths is the truly absurd proposition that our grandparents amended the Constitution in 1913 to authorize the state's exploitation of their resources at its will, in defiance and rejection of the previous tax-limiting Constitutional rules under which Americans had become the freest and wealthiest society in the history of the world.

THIS IS A MYTH! It never happened, and even the premier organs of the state itself have said so endlessly-- but quietly, so as to preserve the on-the-books harmony of the law while allowing the state (and its clients and cronies) to ruthlessly exploit anyone who doesn't know to look and remains in ignorance.

See the proof that this is a myth at losthorizons.com/The16th.htm. Read the 1916 Cornell and Harvard Law Review articles on the Supreme Court's unanimous conclusions about the Sixteenth Amendment. See what the Dept. of Treasury experts admit about the income tax. See what the Supreme Court continues to say about the amendment and the tax over the decades. Learn the real history of the tax and its antecedents.

See what the tax really falls upon and how it really works in application (and how and why it may have been misapplied to you in the past). See what those who have learned the long-obscured truth about the income tax have been accomplishing since that truth was revealed in 2003.

Then go here and see how the state has been struggling to keep you from knowing any of this.

After you take these two enlightening little excursions, recognize that every single person or institution that would lose prestige, power or profits by acknowledging the truth about the tax can be expected to lie about the subject if queried, as will every interest that sees itself benefitting from the existence of a mammoth state (which might even include those who make their living complaining about the mammoth state, or the supposed evils of the income tax). Every one of these are today's equivalents of the invested promoters and defenders of the "divine right of kings" myth that kept people enthralled and exploited in the colonists' time.

But also recognize that now knowing the truth, the power is in your hands. The responsibility is, too.

Rise to deserve the blessings of posterity.

Make today a real "Declaration Day" by making it a personal Declaration Day-- a day of resolution to act on behalf of liberty and the rule of law.

"Like a muddied stream or a polluted fountain is the righteous man who gives way before the wicked."

Proverbs 25:26

 

"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. What I can do, I should do and, with the help of God, I will do."

-Everett Hale

 

"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them, and these will continue till they have been resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress."

-Frederick Douglass

 

"Be the change you want to see in the world."

-Mohandas Gandhi

 

(Click on the image to see what Saruman means.)

 

I encourage everyone to share this article widely.

This is the link.

Those wanting to post a link on their own sites or blogs can find a permalink here.

 Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

Would You Do It?

*****

An Open Letter To My Congressman In Response To James Comey's Decision That Some Folks Are Above The Law:

Congressman David Trott,

1722 Longworth House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

Mr. Trott, I'm going to be blunt. FBI Director James Comey's decision to not pursue an indictment of Hillary Clinton on criminal charges relating to her handling of classified documents is the straw of corruption that has broken this camel's back.

That Clinton arrogantly, contemptuously and serially broke the law with her transference of sensitive government email to private servers is obvious to anyone who's been paying attention.

In Comey's own statement announcing his decision to turn a blind eye to Clinton's crimes he baldly admits that the FBI found that at least 110 classified emails were sent or received on Clinton's private server. Nonetheless, Comey goes on to say: "[W]e did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information..."

Baloney. The first statement contradicts the second. At the very least, among the laws relating to Clinton's deliberate transference of classified materials to her private server is this one:

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

I don't think any jury would buy the notion that Clinton transferred those classified materials to that private server while sleep-walking, or that she didn't intend to retain them in that unauthorized location. The removal was knowingly done, and the intent to retain the materials in the unauthorized location is manifest. Comey's assertion that "no reasonable prosecutor" would bring a case relating to these events is ludicrous.

Properly read, Comey is really saying, "While any prosecutor would bring an indictment against anyone else in a case like this, Sister Hillary gets a pass."

This is not acceptable.

Hillary Clinton should be treated by the United States law enforcement apparatus in exactly the same way that her gardener would be treated if the FBI had the same evidence of wrongdoing against him as it has against her.

The United States Constitution clearly prescribes equality before the law across the board. Treating a political operative like Clinton (or anyone else, Republican, Democrat or whatever) the least bit more favorably than how anyone else would be treated for the same behavior is a violation of Comey's oath of office, in which he swears to support and defend that Constitution.

Consequently, I want Comey impeached, removed from office, and prosecuted for corruption.

I want you to dedicate all your efforts from this point forward toward those ends until they are accomplished. Nothing else matters.

Among all the things that those in your position can lawfully do, the preservation and supremacy of the rule of law is far and away the most important. It is more important than any Republican political initiative or program. It is more important than any political initiative or program, period. Further, tolerating Comey's assault on the rule of law would be a violation of your oath of office.

Accordingly, and sticking with the bluntness: if you don't do everything in your power to secure Comey's impeachment, removal and prosecution, and thereby preserve the rule of law, then I will do everything in my power to see you lose your seat in November.

I want you to go to the wall on this. I want no compromise, no quarter, no deals.

I want you to inform Democrats in Congress who might be tempted to stand in the way of this remedy for partisan or personal reasons that should they do so, they will never again get support from you, in any form, for anything.  I want you to tell your Republican colleagues the same.

This should be the only thing on your agenda from now until Comey is in prison and a law-respecting replacement has taken his office. As I said, the preservation and supremacy of the rule of law is more important than anything else that you could be doing, with no exceptions.

I thank you for your respectful attention to this letter.

Peter E. Hendrickson

Commerce Twp., Michigan

7/6/16

[To my readers]

Do you want to know what you can do unilaterally to solve the problem of corruption in Washington, without reliance on possibly "conflicted" government office-holders? Click here.

P. S. Feel free to make appropriate changes to a copy of this letter and send it to your own congressperson. Find him/her here.

 Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

A Fine, Illustrative Victory

The latest of the 200,000+ government repudiations of the falsehoods Doreen is being ordered to say she believes...

 

Jaime Mondestin

JAIME HAS SECURED ONE OF THOSE FEDERAL VICTORIES that are especially illustrative of the truth uniquely revealed in CtC. Jaime's refund is of everything withheld from him during 2015 in connection with the income tax, of course, as is the typical experience of CtC-educated filers. But in Jaime's case the only thing that had been withheld were amounts purportedly owed as Social Security and Medicare taxes. Here is Jaime's refund check:

And here is the filing that produced it, complete with the new Form 8965 by which the "Obamacare mandate" is addressed in an educated manner.

THE REASONS FOR THE SIGNIFICANCE of this refund being entirely of FICA withholdings are twofold. One of these reasons is that prior to the appearance of CtC such withholdings had NEVER been recovered and were (and sometimes still are) described by tax agency flacks as not refundable under any circumstances. A refund like Jaime's, of nothing BUT such withholdings, emphasizes that CtC has put a truly myth-shattering knowledge into the hands of its students.

The other reason for the significance of Jaime's FICA-only refund is that one of the foolish cognitive sticking-points keeping a large number of folks in the "tax honesty" community from understanding the tax overall and recognizing that liberty from its misapplication is within their grasp if they would only reach out to CtC and take it up is the idea that FICA taxes are "employment" taxes and that means not "income" taxes. Jaime's filing and refund plainly demonstrates that this is a completely mistaken notion much more quickly and dramatically than can be done by reading CtC and learning why and how this is so.

To put it in simple terms, a picture is worth a thousand words, and Jaime paints a bright picture here.

I WANT TO POINT OUT TWO ADDITIONAL FEATURES of Jaime's filing/claim. First, there is Jaime's thoughtful answer to "question 10" on the Form 4852 he submitted in lieu of the incorrect W-2 produced by the payer which had done the errant withholding of amounts now returned to him by the United States. That question asks what steps Jaime took to secure a W-2 or a corrected W-2 from the errant payer, to which Jaime replies, "None, withhelds are correct."

This is notable in that Jaime has recognized the true nature of the instrument on which he is making this statement-- not a supplication, but a declaration. Jaime is saying he doesn't need a "corrected W-2" (a W-2c), because the data that matters on the original, for his purposes-- the amounts withheld, which he is claiming back-- is already correct; while his declaration as to the amount of "wages" paid is itself sufficient and proper rebuttal and correction of the bad information on the W-2, which the government already has. There's a good and comprehending attitude reflected in Jaime's short answer to question #10.

The other thing worth noting is Jaime's very explicit declaration on that same Form 4852 below the question lines. Jaime lays out with careful and painstaking clarity, and importantly, while avoiding argumentation, just what is to be understood by the tax agency processing his claim.

In my view this sort of declaration is in no way necessary. As we all know, the years have witnessed scores of thousands of similarly-CtC-educated claims which lack such explanations and yet go through the gauntlet of tax agency skepticism and come out the other side with the requested check attached. (1099 rebuttals are somewhat different though, as discussed here.)

Nonetheless, a number of folks have made these declarations with their educated returns (usually as "cover letters"), and I like to see them now and then. These explanations make unmistakable that the processing tax agency was under no misunderstandings when it cut that check you see above. Like the refund being of nothing but FICA (which Jaime very pointedly remarks on in his explanation), claims with this extra degree of "impossible to misunderstand" have the best chance of penetrating the thick walls of CtC-truth-denial by which many Americans continue to be afflicted.

MY SINCEREST CONGRATULATIONS TO JAIME, and my thanks, as well, for his sense of responsibility and respect for the law. This good man is among the true Americans on which the Founders' plan for a Constitutionally-limited republic dedicated to the preservation of individual liberty relies.

I hope I'm adding YOUR name to the ranks of these heroes soon.

***

P. S. You'll have noted my subheading at the beginning of this post: "The latest of the 200,000+ government repudiations of the falsehoods Doreen is being ordered to say she believes..." I wonder how many of you are aware that Doreen has been ordered to make the false testimony after being released or go back to prison, as a special condition of her "supervised release"? Doesn't that make you wonder why that false testimony is SO important to the law-defiers?

Or rather, shouldn't that make non-CtC-educated folks in the media wonder why it is so important that this one person fill out a tax form saying what the government would like to see upon it? After all, throughout the entire history of the income tax the government has managed to administer the tax without ever once needing this done before. Shouldn't any journalist with half-a-brain be struck with curiosity as to what is different in this case?

Hint: The perpetuation of the "ignorance tax" scheme relies on Americans continuing to buy into the myths that guide their mistaken self-imposition of the tax. Doreen has prominently said, "I don't believe..." and the "ignorance tax" schemers are prominently helpless in the face of that knowledgeable and meaningfully-made declaration.

Doreen is the little boy pointing out the Emperor's nakedness. The empire is desperate to make her change her tune before more good folks are awakened by Doreen and other red-pill-activated Americans and the whole scheme collapses back to its previous modest size, under which America was the freest and most prosperous place the world had ever known.

Maybe you all can bring this to the attention of these fog-enveloped, troll-controlled journalists. (Somehow my emails don't appear to reach many of them...)

 Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

A Great New Outreach Tool

ChFC TOM BOTTARO, author of 'Secrets of the Tax Code- A Business-Owner's Introduction to the Truth About the Income Tax', has shared a nice, concise one-page flyer for introducing American heroes-in-waiting to the means by which they will restore the republic and the true rule of law.

Get Tom's flyer here, and help raise the Founders' army.

 Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

Interested In Some Excellent CtC-Educated Radio?

*****

A Michigan Version Of The "Watching The Watchmen" Amendment Has Been Proposed

*****

Did you know…

 …The US may be the only country in the world where people must commit perjury in order to owe and pay ‘God’s things to Caesar’?

If you work in the private sector, stop falsely swearing that your private-sector earnings are federal “income”1.  Perjury is a crime.  Exercise the law’s provision for protecting your private-sector earnings from the 154-year-old2 indirect excise known as the federal income tax.  Rebut fraudulent allegations made by your payers regarding the legal nature of your work and the earnings derived therefrom, so that you pay only your fair share.  Join the hundreds of thousands of honest, law-abiding Americans who have been doing so for more than a decade.  Learn how for free at losthorizons.com.

1--“We must reject… …the broad contention submitted in behalf of the government that all receipts—everything that comes in—are income…”.

United States Supreme Court, So. Pacific v. Lowe, 247 U.S. 330, (1918)

2—The income tax in the United States was first instituted into law on July 1, 1862, during Lincoln’s presidency under the excise laws of the United States.   The preamble to the 1939 Internal Revenue Code traces its roots to this original income tax law.

LostHorizons.com

Get this flyer as a printable .pdf here

*****

Poisonous Pieties

Now click here to learn the truth about the myths that have kept you from knowing the truth about the income tax

*****

Have I Ever Mentioned That The Revelations Of CtC Are Targeted By Trolls?

FORMER CBS REPORTER SHERYL ATKISSON describes how this kind of dis-information campaign is done. Despite the annoying preliminary 15 seconds or so of advertising, this video of her presentation is very much worth watching:

(H/T to Greg Belcher for finding and forwarding this great presentation.)

Losthorizons.com is one of those websites specifically-targeted by the corrupt interests at Wikipedia described by Atkisson. The behind-the-scenes folks at that site won't allow links on their pages to anything posted at losthorizons.com, nor even just text corrections of misinformation in their pages about the income tax.

That's the least of it. Click here for some specific discussion of the enormous campaign that's been actively spreading false information in hope of discouraging legitimate media attention, as well as men and women simply seeking the truth about the tax and liberty from the scourge of the "ignorance tax".

PLEASE GIVE SOME SERIOUS THOUGHT to the fact that YOU being secure in your own freedom rests on others learning the truth as well, and recognize that it falls to you to help overcome the dis-information campaign. Post and share your videos; share your victories; help silence the agents-provocateur and distraction-injectors whose nonsense is discussed and debunked here; and widely (and frankly, impatiently) share this page, this page and this page, challenging everyone in your address book to disconnect the phone and the TV for an afternoon and get educated.

Doing these things will be what makes it happen, Cap'n.

Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

A Housekeeping Note

OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS I've heard from a number of folks that a firewall known as "Comodo" blocks access to this website. This is apparently a glitch in that program. This site is safe, as can be seen by going here.

Please share this info with others in your own address book so it gets around-- obviously those suffering the ill effects of this defect in Comodo won't be able to see it here themselves until they go into their firewall settings and manually whitelist losthorizons.com.

ALSO!!! Please go to the trouble of sharing the email you got alerting you to this new newsletter posting with as many people as possible.

Over the course of time the ISP I use (Yahoo) is periodically put on "spam" blacklists. If I do a sending of newsletter announcements during such an interval, my address can get tagged that way, too, and my email can then end up disappearing into spam folders in the email systems of what are actually newsletter subscribers. Unless told to look for them and whitelist mail from @losthorizons.com, some of these folks won't ever know that this has happened.

Pasted below are some how-to guides for several of the more popular email programs. Yours might be listed; if it is not, these steps might guide you through doing the whitelisting anyway, since there will be basic similarities among programs. Failing that, your program's "help" files or online info should be able to walk you through the whitelisting process.

Yahoo:

There are two things you can do:

1. Check your Yahoo! Bulk folder. If you see email from losthorizons.com, highlight it and click Not Spam.

2. Create a filter to automatically send email from losthorizons.com to your Inbox.

  • Click Options in the top right navigation bar.

  • Select Mail Options from the list that drops down.

  • Choose Filters.

  • Click the Add button.

  • Choose the "from" field to match in the incoming message.

  •  Choose "contains" for the criterion.

  • Enter @losthorizons.com.

  • Then choose the Inbox as the destination folder.

AOL:

To make sure email gets delivered to your AOL inbox, you must add @losthorizons.com to your Custom Sender List.

  • Click the Spam Controls link on the lower right side of your inbox screen.

  • When the Mail & Spam Controls box appears, click the Custom Sender list link.

  • Choose the Allow email from ... (@losthorizons.com) option.

  • Click Add.

  • Click Save.

AOL Web Mail:

If you are using AOL web mail, simply reply to an email from losthorizons.com.

Hotmail Live, Windows Live or MSN:

Either,

Check The Junk Folder: If email from losthorizons.com is in this folder, click Show content to view the body of the email. Click Mark as safe.

Or,

Manually Add to Safe List:

  • Click Options in the upper right corner of your Hotmail screen.

  • In the body of the page under Junk e-mail click the link Safe and blocked senders.

  • Click the link Safe senders.

  • Enter @losthorizons.com.

  • Click Add to list.

Gmail:

  • Click the Show search options downward-pointing triangle in your Gmail's main search field.

  • Type @losthorizons.com under From.

  • Follow the Create filter with this search ›› link at the bottom of the search sheet.

  • Make sure Never send it to Spam is checked.

  • Click Create filter.

*****

 Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

 

*****

 

WANTED! Your Article!!

Sharpen those pens, people!

MY FRIENDS, THIS NEWSLETTER NEEDS your creativity, your clear thinking, and your expressive energy! In short, this newsletter needs your journalism!

I know that writing for public consumption isn't everyone's cup of tea. But those who CAN string a few words together can importantly serve the educated, activist community by writing and submitting thoughtful, well-researched and persuasive articles on certain topics for posting on these pages.

Here are several topics for which submissions are desired:

  • Why the media is silent about the astonishing 12-year history of government acknowledgements of the accuracy of CtC's revelations and its simultaneous efforts to keep Americans from knowing about those revelations.

  • Why educating more Americans about the true history and actual provisions of the income tax is the most important thing that anyone seeking to restrain the state and restore the republic can do today.

  • Why "tax honesty gurus" stay mum about CtC and its unprecedented accomplishments in freeing people from improper application of the tax.

  • Why hunkering down in every-man-for-himself silence in the face of statist and fascist assaults on the rule of law leads to greater harm than what is hunkered-down against; that is, how fearful behavior just strengthens the thing feared.

  • How much better it is to encourage (and practice) bravery, honesty and openness than to counsel (and succumb to) fear, lies and concealment.

Articles should be 1500 words or less, with working titles and author's name at the beginning. Composition should strive for two and three sentence paragraphs organized in the form of a theme paper. Intend to persuade and inspire, not browbeat. Format should be either .doc or .odt. All submissions selected for posting may be subject to editing.

BTW, CtC Warrior Greg Sutton has just had a good educational/inspirational article published here.

Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

Why Aren't People Suing?

SO, I WONDER HOW MANY FOLKS have thought about the fact that the First Amendment prohibits even a bogus "frivolous return penalty" threat, such as the customized "3176C" notices that a few educated filers have received over the years (see here, here and here for some examples)? After all, a "frivolous penalty" threat amounts to a threat by the government to punish someone for saying what the government wishes they would not say (or for not saying what the government wishes they would say).

Even when the threat is entirely reliant on the timidity and cooperation of the target for its effect or an outright hoax, the object of the exercise is to control the target's speech. Thus even when technically toothless it remains a gross violation of the Constitution and the victim's rights.

The threat is also intended to influence the target into at least withdrawing a claim to the refund of withheld or paid-in property, which would then default to government ownership (and really, the threat is meant to coerce an active endorsement of a government claim to the property, giving the appearance that the government's taking control of that property is proper and beyond legal challenge). Thus, these "frivolous penalty" threats are doubly criminal.

AFTER ALL, PROHIBITING INHERENTLY CORRUPT exercises of state power of precisely this sort is the reason we have a "freedom of speech" element in the First Amendment. Americans can't be made to say things for the government's benefit, nor punished for saying things the government finds inconvenient or at its expense-- this is perhaps the most thoroughly-settled aspect of Constitutional law there is. See a nice summary of Supreme Court case-law on this point in sections A., B. and C. of this paper.

Plainly, there is no exception to the amendment's provision whereby the government can simply argue, "We can punish you until you say what we want you to say, either directly or by being silent in the face of the allegations of others, as long as we call your expressions "frivolous", or exercise the coercion in the context of taxation..."

I think people subjected to this rights violation should be furious and in a suing mood, don't you?

(BTW, as an interesting side note, consider the limiting factor built in to the legitimate application of the 'frivolous return penalty" provisions, confining their application to those who are speaking not for themselves, and not as sovereign individuals in their own capacity, but on behalf of someone else, and as a legal duty, not an elective act:

26 USC § 6671 - Rule for application of assessable penalties

 (b) Person defined The term “person”, as used in this subchapter, includes an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.

The relevant speech of those within this specialized sub-class of "person" can perhaps be deemed outside the First Amendment's ambit. By this mechanism the "frivolous return penalty" is harmonized with the Constitution.

By the same token, the First Amendment prohibition of government speech-violations against undistinguished persons means that the sub-class defined at 26 USSC § 6671 must necessarily be confined to those described in that definition, per CtC scholarship. If that sub-class were not so confined, but deemed to extend to any kind of persons other than those circumscribed by a "limited-expansion-only" construction of the definition, the "frivolous penalty" would be unconstitutional.)

"Like a muddied stream or a polluted fountain is the righteous man who gives way before the wicked."

-Proverbs 25:26

Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

In Passing... Three cheers for Russia, which has stepped up to join Iran in aid of its long-time ally Syria against the noxious "Islamic State" nutcases that have sprung up like toadstools in the wake of the destabilization of the Middle East by the noxious neocon nutcases running Washington for the last 15 years.

More Educated Americans Testify, Showing Why The Deep State Fears CtC

"If the taxpayers of this country ever discovered that we operate on 98% bluff, the entire system will collapse."

-Reported remark by an internal revenue service officer to Sen. Henry E. Bellmon (R. Okla.) on April 15, 1971.

 

"The Tax Code represents the genius of legal fiction...  The IRS has never really known why people pay the income tax... The IRS encourages voluntary compliance, through FEAR."

-Jack Warren Wade Jr., former IRS officer in charge of the IRS Nationwide Revenue Officer Training Program, in his book ‘When You Owe The IRS’

CtC-EDUCATED, AMERICAN HERITAGE-LOVING grown-up Joe Black shares his testimony here. Tom Romin shares his testimony here. Greg Sutton shares his here. Enjoy Robert Harvey's testimony here. Tom's and Greg's and Robert's words, like those of others here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here, and all those whose evidence has been shared here, are solid examples of why the Deep State fears CtC.

It's this simple: If you study CtC you will know the truth about the tax. Further, you will know that you know the truth, beyond any doubt.

ONLY CtC will give you that certainty, because CtC is exclusively and uniquely complete and correct, as can be seen by any of thousands of different acknowledgements of every possible kind, from this to this to this to this.

Most telling, in its own way, is the government robotically resorting for years now to the strawman of falsely ascribing to CtC the ridiculous arguments that "wages are not income" and that only federal, state and local government workers are subject to the tax. This false ascription is then used as the basis for claiming the book is "false and frivolous"-- a lame and transparent dodge begging the question of why the state won't acknowledge what the book REALLY says and then attempt to dispute THAT.

Once you know the truth revealed in CtC, acting in accordance with that truth WILL liberate you from being an ignorance tax serf. This, the deep state fears mightily.

FURTHER, ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT deeply-known truth can NEVER legitimately qualify as any kind of a "tax crime", or for any penalties or fines. This is not only because what CtC teaches about the law and the tax is technically and legally correct, but also because all tax crimes are crimes of "intent" and all penalties rest for their legitimacy on "intent".

An educated filing in sincere accordance with what is known and believed to be true and correct cannot be lawfully treated as invalid, criminal or subject to penalty. Any effort by the state to claim otherwise is inherently corrupt.

Nor can any accurate and truthful filing be overcome by any lawful means, which is why the state is so focused on forcing Doreen to declare that she doesn't believe what CtC teaches, with the openly-declared hope that her doing so would discourage other Americans from acting on what they also believe.

LIKE HENRY BELLMON WAS TOLD, the "ignorance tax" scheme relies on bluff-- pretending that the truth is what the government suggests that it is (despite what the law and the courts and every other authority have actually been saying about it for 150 years). And like Jack Warren Wade, Jr. says, the scheme relies on fear-- doing everything possible to make people afraid to act on their scheme-shattering knowledge of the truth.

In short, the "ignorance tax" scheme can only survive if Americans can be bluffed into not seeking out the truth, and if those who learn that truth can be discouraged from acting on that truth.

But those who know the truth, and know they know the truth, cannot not act.

Acting on the truth is a moral imperative, as well as a legal imperative.

The undaunted actions of those who know the truth are "calls" against the bluff. Each "call" ratchets-up the spread of the truth exponentially and forces state acknowledgement of that truth, one way or another; and each such acknowledgment takes America one step closer to freedom from the 75-year state-unleashing, people-restraining "ignorance tax" scheme.

And THAT's why the deep state fears CtC.

"Be the change you want to see in the world."

-Mohandas Gandhi

Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

A New Policy

I HAVE DONE MY BEST to lead this country to liberty from the mis-applied income tax. I have labored hard. I've shed a lot of sweat, a fair bit of blood and more than a few tears. But I seem to be pretty poor at that kind of work, because...

Right now, having just been forced to deliver my beloved bride to a prison camp, I'm bleeding pretty heavily. And yet, when I have asked all of you for what I firmly believe is a necessary resource to move the ball downfield and give my darling wife (and all the rest of us) the best chance at justice and an end to the assault on the rule of law-- simple testimonial videos requiring nothing from any of you but the phone in your pocket and three minutes of speaking from the heart-- I have had only a handful of people answer my call.

I CAN'T KEEP GOING THIS WAY. I have to be able to turn my attention away from writing new persuasive or skepticism-addressing articles week after week, and toward research, analysis and educational presentations that will benefit everyone already in this community. I need time to do some suing, and to bring together the resources and talent toward that end.

As said, it is my firm belief that your testimonial videos are the resource that I need to make big things happen, and they are unquestionably the thing I need to allow me to turn my attention away from trying to get horses to drink at the waterhole to which I have led them. Your words, in your great numbers and all in your own different ways, will do that better than anything I write possibly could.

And yet, you are not providing them, even despite my having been asking you for them for many years now (I renewed my entreaties as a front-page item just lately, in response to the media skepticism over what has been done to Doreen, but I first posted my request for these something along the lines of eight years ago...).

Therefore, with enormous reluctance, I am making portions of this website restricted access only. People have been urging me to do this for years now, telling me I should impose a charge to access my work-product, so as to enable me to keep producing. I have never been inclined to do so. I ask for donations, and will continue to do that, and if they do not come, then I will conclude that my work is of no value to anyone, and I will close shop.

But I now WILL charge a special something for access to some key portions of that work-- testimonial videos, as discussed, described and demonstrated here.

STARTING TODAY, SELECTED PAGES CONSTITUTING primarily "legal resources" pages will require passwords for access, and to get a password, I need your video. Similarly, if an email comes my way asking for guidance or assistance, it had best have a video attached, if I don't already have yours posted.

I hate to play it this way, but I want to win.

I'll tell you a story from when I was coaching my kids in soccer. Both of my kids at a certain age in their careers had run into a wall common to all but the very exceptional. They had gotten to be pretty good, and they wanted to enjoy the benefits of their hard work. But the arrival of this interest coincided with a new self-consciousness which made them reluctant to risk failing and looking foolish. So, they were hanging back from seizing the main chance when it appeared, and driving for the goal.

My solution was to post on the wall of our dining room a couple of simple points about self-discipline, the chief of which is this: You can't score a goal if you don't take a shot.

That's how it is here, too. If you don't stand up, you are laying down, and you'll never score that goal.

Here is what my kids live by now, in their own version of that lesson. I hear it from them all the time as they excel (accompanied by the sound of a father's breast swelling with pride): Go hard, or go home.

You, too. Go hard, or go home. Send those videos.

Do I ask for a lot? I want your victories to post, your financial support, your efforts spreading the word, and your beautiful faces and inspiring words, too. It IS a lot.

But I'll let Frederick Douglas explain:

"Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation…want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightening. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters…. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."

Fear nothing but God.

 Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

Give Yourself A 30% Raise: A New Flyer

 

Get this flyer as a .pdf here, cut out the sections and spread 'em around to EVERYONE.

Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Post a comment on this article

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

What Makes YOU A Warrior For The Truth?

We each have our reasons, and our story. It's time, and it's needed, for you to share yours with the world.

 

"The day we see truth and do not speak is the day we begin to die."

-Martin Luther King, Jr.

What does it for you?

Is it simply because no moral and upstanding person has any choice when it comes to telling the truth over his or her signature, whether on tax forms or anywhere else?

 

Is it recognition of the critical importance of the rule of law, and the knowledge that if everybody leaves its caretaking to someone else, it will soon be lost to us completely?

 

Is it the money?

 

Maybe it's just simple respect for your own rights as a human being, who is not and cannot be not involuntarily subordinated to others?

 

Maybe it's just simple respect for your general civic responsibility to be the grown-up and enforce frugality and restraint on a big, powerful creature of our own devising which otherwise is like a badly-raised teenage boy given whiskey and car keys and let loose on the road to wreak havoc?

 

Or is it, perhaps, a more acute anxiety that if our bonfire of a state isn't damped, and quickly, it'll soon burn down the house around us all?

 

What IS it that firms up your jaw and stiffens your resolve?

 

It's time to take off the bushel and share your light!

 

I would like you to think about what it is that motivates you for a few moments (or all day, if you like), and then send me your thoughts. I want to put YOUR reasons to work inspiring folks who don't yet understand what this is all about.

 

In this day and age, the most effective way for you to share your thinking for the benefit of others is to video-record yourself talking about how you feel, and explaining what inspires and motivates YOU.

 

All you need is a webcam or cell-phone equipped with a camera. If you don't have, or know how to use, one of these, have a friend help.

 

If needed, write a little script for yourself. Better, though, to just speak extemporaneously, after spending a little time sorting out your thoughts and getting down into your heart. Perhaps make it a video of someone in your family, or a close friend, interviewing you.

 

Keep yourself to no more than 2 or 3 minutes, and keep in mind that the purpose is not to educate, but to INSPIRE, ENCOURAGE and ENERGIZE. Your video will be one of many to be shared.

 

You needn't feel any obligation to be profound, and you shouldn't try to explain anything about the law, other than to say that you have read it and you know it's on your side. You just need to be sincere, and uplifting. Your object is to make your audience want to have what you have, and to be where you are in your heart.

 

Keep in mind that you're speaking to an audience that doesn't yet know ANYTHING about the subject, and whose first reaction is, "This must be illegal; this must be dangerous; this is too good to be true." You want to pull that audience right past such things, and straight to a focus on truth, morality, and our American heritage of liberty and the rule of law.

 

Remember: INSPIRE, ENCOURAGE, ENERGIZE.

 

Speak about rights. Speak about morality, and the obligation of a grown-up and responsible person to speak the truth and to enforce the Constitution. Speak about everyone's duty to give to God what is God's, always, and to Caesar only what is really Caesar's. Speak of your obligation to respect yourself, and to look out for the current and future well-being of your children and your fellow citizens. Speak of CtC, and what its information has done for your understanding and resolve. Show the book.

 

If you have had victories, describe them. Better still, show them, if possible.

 

Be clear about just what you accomplished: EVERYTHING back-- Social Security, Medicare and all; a "notice of deficiency" closing notice; an on-paper agreement or acknowledgment that your earnings weren't subject to the tax and everything withheld or paid-in was an "overpayment"; a transcript showing all $0s; or whatever happened.

 

When you speak of state victories, name the state. If you had to overcome balkiness from a tax agency before winning any victory, describe that, too!

 

If you're in a battle now, speak of your resolve to uphold the law, come what may. If you haven't yet begun to act, speak of your decision to do so, and your plans.

 

Remember, your purpose is to INSPIRE, ENCOURAGE and ENERGIZE.

 

If you're dealing with ongoing balkiness, describe that, too, if you wish-- but be sure to explain why you're not discouraged, and why you are not standing down, not slinking back into the barn, and not choosing to endorse the lies.

 

Mention what you do for a living, whether you're a doctor, homemaker, lawyer, trucker, IT guy or gal, or a retiree or student. Help people understand that the company of grown-up activist Americans they are being invited to join cuts across all demographics and all interests-- with the common denominator being respect for the law and love of the principles on which this great country was founded.

 

This is your chance to get a LOT accomplished.

 

We've all had frustrating occasions of trying to explain all this to a friend, neighbor, family member or co-worker, only to pile up against the wall of a mind not yet ready to listen and learn. Here is your chance to address a self-selected audience of folks who have themselves decided that it's time for them to begin paying attention, and have clicked on your testimonial for exactly that reason.

 

Further, think about this: You want judges, bureaucrats, CPAs, lawyers, the HR people where you work, your pastors, your neighbors and everyone else to acknowledge the truth about the tax openly and straightforwardly. How and why would these folks do this if YOU won't?

You want these folks to learn the truth. Why would they even recognize that there is a truth to be learned if you won't attest to having learned it yourself? You've got to stand up, face forward and chin up and tell these folks that you have studied and checked and verified and seen the evidence and seen the government evasions and you know that the tax is not the capitation that the beneficiary government wants everyone to think it is but a benign, but strictly limited thing, and that they need to study and learn that, too.

Again, if you have victories to show, that's nice, and powerful, too. But you don't have to have victories to display in order to declare your knowledge of what the law says. I've never flown around the world, but I've seen the evidence and considered the arguments, and I'm not hesitant to declare it a sphere...

Even those of you who haven't yet studied CtC have surely read this short document, and have verified everything in it for yourself. You should therefore be declaring its veracity and its message, loud and proud. Again, if you won't say it, how can you hope that others will ever even bother to look at the facts?

Be the change you want to see in the world, or there won't be any change.

So, please make and send those videos right away! You can share them with me via a cloud-based drive space like OneDrive.Live.com or GoogleDrive, or mail DVDs to me at 232 Oriole St., Commerce Twp., Michigan 48382, or even email to me if each file is no more than 20 megs (and you can break a video up if need be-- I can reassemble them). Render as .mpg or mp4, if possible; if not, send them how you have them and I'll make them work.

 

Remember, the restoration of institutional respect for individual rights and the rule of law depends on enough individuals insisting upon it. Do your part to let those starting to rub the sleep from their eyes know that there is a community already waiting for their fellowship with open arms and open hearts and shining spirits.

 

See how some of your fellow warriors for the truth have done their parts in videos sent over the years: Forrest Anderson, Brian Harriss, Joe Black, Jeremy Lee, Guy Placencio, Joe H., Robert Harvey, Kennard van Camp, Greg Sutton, Paul Eberle, Tim Kendrick, Christine Schrock, Brady Ness, Barry Sullivan, Brian Farmer, Greg Belcher, Patrick Hart and Ryan Latila, Abbott Morgan, Val Smithson, Sandor Bors, Erik Segelstrom, The Mystery Woman, Matt Zelina, Rod Schimdt, Tom Romin, Glenn H., Ms. B., Paul Smith, Patrick Mooney and John Arthur.

 

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."

-Margaret Mead

Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Care to post a comment on this article?

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

The Crime of the Misapplied Income Tax

from

Was Grandpa Really a Moron?

Critical Inquiries for a New American Century

 

Bob’s Bicycles

or

Getting Free Of The "Income" Tax Scheme Is As Easy As Falling Off A Bike

 

 

 

To get an idea of how today's "income" tax scheme works, try this little exercise:

 

Think of the federal government as a guy named Bob, who lives down the street from you in a town that is really big on bicycles. Bikes get used for commuting, deliveries, shopping, etc.. In fact, other than walking, bicycles are the exclusive form of transportation in your town.

Your neighbor Bob has a by-the-mile bicycle-renting business-- "Bob's Bicycles". Bob's Bicycles is far and away the biggest business in town.

Part of Bob’s success is because he does a lot of contract business. However, Bob doesn't just get paid by riders who have signed an agreement with him, or even just those using Bob's bikes. Bob gets something every time anybody in town does any riding at all, through an odd combination of circumstances that took many years to come together.

 

Here's how it happened...

 

Bob's Bicycles was launched long ago by the great grandfather of the present Bob (Bob IV). Great Grandpa Bob started out not only with a main location for his contract business-- he also had the bright idea of setting up spots around town where he parked some of his bikes for use by the more occasional rider, on an "honor system". Anyone could take and use one of these bikes, but they were expected to keep track of their mileage, and send Bob a "1040 Mileage Ridden/Rent Due Form" (and the appropriate rent), periodically. The initial design of the form was like this:

 

I, ______________, rode a Bob's Bicycle a total of _____ miles this year.

At Bob's rental rate of $.15 per mile, I owe Bob $______

 

I said that Great Grandpa Bob planned to deal with these occasional riders on the "honor system", and that's true. But he liked his money, too, and didn't want to miss anything that was due him. So, after setting up the "self-serve" locations, Great Grandpa Bob went around handing out "W-2, 1099 or K-1 Rider Reporting Forms" to every other business in town. The forms-- accompanied by notices that if Bob didn't get his rent from someone riding a bicycle in connection with any business, he would sue the company involved-- said:

 

Click here to enjoy the rest of this illuminating little parable

(and if you want to see a liberating transformation take place THIS YEAR, forward this file to everyone in your address book)

Twitter  Facebook Digg Reddit LinkedIn StumbleUpon

Care to post a comment on this article?

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

 

You Can’t Fight Well When You Don’t Know What You’re Fighting About

 

If you are having an argument with the IRS or any other tax agency,

  • You are NOT being presumed to have made “corporate profit”.

  • You are NOT being alleged to have received “foreign income”.

  • You are NOT entangled in an invisible “adhesion contract”.

  • You are NOT being obligated by a law whose subject is never identified.

You are being targeted because REAL EVIDENCE exists that YOU PERSONALLY HAD “INCOME” to which the revenue laws apply-- even though that evidence is almost certainly incorrect, and CAN be corrected.

 

There IS "A Law" By Which You Can Be Made Liable, And This Is How It Works

 

Now Learn How To Be Master Of The Situation

 

See the Proof

 

Care to post a comment on this article?

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

 

*****

 

Photographed on 1-70 in Missouri. America is waking up.

 

Do You Know What Happens When YOU Decide To "Let Someone Else Do It"?

NOTHING.

 

"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something. What I can do, I should do and, with the help of God, I will do."

-Everett Hale

(...and every other person who ever really deserved liberty)

 

"God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it."

-Daniel Webster

 

"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves."

-Edward R. Murrow

 

*****

 

TOOLS FOR SPREADING THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX

 

 

Get this graphic as a printable/postable/mailable .pdf

 

Browse other transformational-truth-spreading tools

 

Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

CtC Warrior SanDiegoScott has put together a great little 20-question quiz to test your knowledge of the law regarding the United States "income" tax. Test yourself, test your friends and family! Test your accountant and tax attorney, and help them learn the liberating truth!!

 

Click here to take the test

 

Find more quizzes here

Care to post a comment on this article?

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

 

*****

CtC Videos And Audio Resources

 

*****

"Never must thou take up a false cry, or join hands with the guilty by giving false witness in their favor. Never must thou follow with the crowd in doing wrong, or be swayed by many voices so as to give false judgment; even pity for the poor must not sway thee when judgment is to be given."

-Exodus 23:1-3

 

Doing A Little High-Payoff Math

 

If each person receiving this newsletter each week distributed as few as 100 of any of the great outreach tools featured here to co-workers, friends, neighbors and family members (or just strangers on the street, in the mall, etc...), we could have SEVERAL MILLION new Americans suddenly introduced to the liberating truth about the tax!

 

Just like that! In one week!

 

C'mon, people, let's roll on this!

 

“Most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who have kept on trying when there seemed to be no hope at all.”

‑Dale Carnegie

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

 

*****

 

Spread The Truth

 

*****

 

A Few Tips For Making Best Use Of This WebSite

 

USE THE SITE MAP!!!

 

USE THE SITE SEARCH!!!

 

When directed to a page by topic or link, read everything.

 

I know that this can mean the investment of a lot of time, attention and effort, but although some may imagine otherwise, I don't write as much as I do because I can't think of any other way to spend my time...

 

Furthermore, when you encounter a hyperlink within, or associated with, the text you are reading, follow it!

 

It is pretty common these days for web-based material to be littered with hyperlinks. Sometimes the purpose is to provide definitions or examples, in order to ensure that folks reading the original material aren't presented with a word or reference which they don't understand. Sometimes the links lead to illustrations pertinent to the original text.

 

It is common-- and perfectly understandable-- for folks who are confident that they are familiar with language or references within the main text they are reading to get in the habit of skipping over included links. I do it all the time, myself!

 

However, I very rarely include links for definitional or explanatory purposes; and when I DO make a link out of text in one page it is generally to another self-contained page, rather than merely illustrative material. These other pages contain material the clear understanding of which I deem highly important for the proper and complete understanding of the original page. (Links to CtC, the Victories pages, CtC Warriors and so on are obvious exceptions to this general rule. On the other hand, a link to the victory Highlights or 'Every Which Way But Loose' pages, which might seem like such exceptions, are not. The special selection of victories on those pages, and the filed docs and tax-agency correspondences included therewith, themselves constitute highly instructive material which merits careful attention. Thus care needs to be taken in all cases.)/p>

 

Please make a habit of clicking on all provided links and at least looking briefly to ensure that the linked page is one with which you are completely familiar from another study session.

 

Finally, please keep in mind that, annoying though it may seem at first blush (but not, I trust, upon reflection), I constantly tweak material already posted. Obviously this doesn't mean that every page is in flux at all times, but it does mean that if you are directed to a page that IS familiar, it's worthwhile to read it through again if it's been a while since your last having done so.

 

*****

 

Your Comments

To comment on any article in this update (or to read comments of others), click on the talk balloon below.

(It may take a while for your newly-posted comments to appear; also, please understand that this is NOT a place for posing questions about individual tax situations.)

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

 

"Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves."

-George Gordon (Lord) Byron