The News Current Events and Continuing Education for June 27 through July 10, 2016 “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” -James Madison
"There are two distinct classes of men...those who pay taxes and those who receive and live upon taxes." - Thomas Paine C'mon! CtC can't be right! You're crazy! If CtC were actually right, it would mean the government's been concealing and denying the truth for years on end, and everybody knows THAT would never happen... (Edward Snowden, come home! It was all just a bad dream; there really is No Such Agency!)
Do you know someone truly steeped in the Kool-Aid?
I mean someone who finds it easier to believe that the far-better-educated, far-more-suspicious-of-government Americans of a hundred years ago were complete morons who granted authority to the state to take whatever it wished from themselves and their posterity than to imagine that they themselves simply misunderstand the true nature of the income tax? Even while knowing that their beliefs about the tax are derived entirely from the representations of those who profit from those beliefs (like tax bureaucrats and "tax professionals")?
Do you know someone like that? Shake them awake with the latest (fourteenth) edition of CtC!
I'm delighted when anyone wishes to share what I have posted here with others! Sharing this page is an important means of moving toward the restoration of the rule of law-- PLEASE DO IT!! But I'd appreciate your doing so by directing your friends here themselves, rather than by copying and emailing the material.
*** The Newsletter is interested in your work! If you are a writer, scholar, or just a dedicated Warrior with a good story to tell, please consider sharing your words and your wisdom with our thousands of readers! Click here to learn how.
*****
-Samuel Adams
BRAVO to the Brits! The Founders must be delighted as their former colonial masters offer the sincerest of flatteries THREE CHEERS FOR OUR BRILLIANT BRITISH COUSINS, the wiser majority of whom have ignored the whining and scare-mongering of those exploiting the status quo and taken steps to decentralize power and reclaim Britain's sovereignty! Maybe Michigan and Oregon and Idaho and Texas (and the other union states) will follow their fine example someday soon. After all, what the Brits have rejected is exactly the kind of consolidated power structure our Founding generation rejected (however much asscravats like Hamilton and his ilk lobbied for it in every way possible). Sadly, it is also exactly the kind of consolidated power structure to which America has since fallen prey, thanks to a century or more of deeply-sophisticated conditioning and manipulation by those benefitting from the suppression and distortion of our actual (and still supreme) foundational legal and political structure. What our Founders chose and established is basically a free-trade zone and mutual-defense-plan, with the added benefit of an available common currency which could be used by anyone throughout all the states, and which served to keep competing coinage and negotiables stable and honest. That's the design of the American system under the US and state Constitutions as written and intended (and in harmony with the foundational principles of the Declaration of Independence). What we have now in America, in sharp betrayal of the Founders' efforts and sacrifices, is a deeply-centralized, sticky-fingers-in-everything, nanny-with-a-truncheon monster of a state, just like the EU which our cousins across the pond have just told "Goodbye, and good riddance!" The only difference is that our Mordor-on-the-Potomac is more entrenched, arrogant and corrupt than Brussels and its courtiers have yet had time to become. SO, AGAIN, THREE CHEERS FOR GREAT BRITAIN! Diffused power is safer power, and by looking out for their own interests the Brits have just made the world a safer place.* Further, the message patriotic Brits sent out last week is just as significant: Every "made man" who has imagined him-or-herself to be permanently protected from accountability for any crimes they may commit in service to the status quo has just learned, to their dismay, that the "status quo" is NOT actually perpetual, and cataclysmic upheavals can and will happen. This will give some of them pause, to the benefit of the "99%". I confess that I've always been an anglophile-- the literature that has emanated from members of the UK over the centuries had seduced me thoroughly even when just a boy. Adult perspectives and increased knowledge have necessarily tempered my affections since then, and in a big way, but today I am happy to indulge my youthful enthusiasm once again. HIP, HIP, HOORAY for Jolly Old England!
*This self-interest/safer place dynamic partakes of the same hugely-important principle being exercised by CtC-educated Americans, as is explained here.
Briefly Regarding "Orlando" ANY GOVERNMENT WILLING TO SIEZE ON A CRIME like the shootings in Orlando as justification for abridging arms rights to any extent and in any respect has thereby proven itself the very threat to liberty against which the Second Amendment was adopted. The right to keep and bear arms (which means "weapons", not "hunting pieces") is plainly and properly secured under the terms of the supreme law of the land. A government that shows a willingness or desire to violate our fundamental law by compromise of that right is an oath-breaking and very dangerous government. As Judge of the Ninth Circuit Alex Kozinski has wisely put it: "The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed - where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once." Click here to see what the Founders had in mind when putting the Second Amendment in place, and then spread that .pdf around. Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend
This Week's Very Interesting Featured Victory A wonderful exposé of an agency dodge; plus three more victories, from the "better late than never" category JOE H. IS NOW A TWO-VICTORY VETERAN WITH THE FEDS (though having a tough time with a bizarrely-balky state DOR). Joe's $14,690.00 complete federal refund for 2014 has been posted here for about a year now; to that we add today his refund of what was withheld during 2015. Unlike last year's refund, though, the $7,927.00 Joe received a few weeks ago is a "victory-in-progress", so far. Here's what this means: The United States has returned every penny of what had been withheld from Joe during 2015 under the normal "Subtitle A" tax provisions. In this case that was $7,927.00 which was withheld under the provisions of Chapter 24 of Subtitle C of the code. That type of withholding gets set aside in an escrow account and then is credited against any tax which proves to be owing at the end of the year, with the balance being refunded. (See pp. 174-175 of CtC for the statutory provisions laying out this relationship.) The form 4852 Joe filed as part of his return/claim (see it here) shows the Chapter 24 withholding as the nominal "federal tax withheld". Here is the IRS notice announcing Joe's refund of this amount:
Here is Joe's bank statement showing the deposit:
The complete refund of this withheld amount is an agreement that Joe owed no tax for the year-- had he owed anything, this withheld amount would have been tapped to cover the liability. Indeed, the IRS explicitly acknowledges that Joe had no "income" and owed no tax, in harmony with this refund, on the second page of its notice:
So, everybody agrees that Joe had no "income". In particular (the significance of which will become clear in a moment), everyone agrees that Joe had received no "wages"-- that's the specially-labeled form of "income" under which Chapter 24 withholding takes place, and the species of "income" upon which a Subtitle A tax will be presumed to have arisen in the case of a worker like Joe. And again, everyone agrees Joe received no "income". But despite everyone agreeing that Joe had no "income" upon which a tax liability could arise, the IRS is still trying to get away with keeping a lot of Joe's money. AS WILL HAVE BEEN NOTICED when looking at Joe's sworn return/claim, and the 4852 included within it, Joe had a good deal more withheld than just the $7,927.00 he has received back so far. In fact, Joe's claim seeks $13,669.00-- the total of all amounts withheld from him. This total includes not just the nominal "federal income tax withheld" under provisions of Subtitle C's Chapter 24 (the withholding for deposit against the "normal tax" under Subtitle A) but also the Social security and Medicare "income" taxes, which are withheld under the provisions of Chapter 21 of Subtitle C (the withholding for the FICA "surtax" on "income"). The IRS is trying a gambit on Joe, pretending that the surtax wasn't withheld, or somehow should be excluded from the total withheld, and hoping Joe won't realize what's going on. (Or the agency hopes the boldness and incoherence of the corrupt ploy will intimidate or confuse Joe into taking his partial refund and letting the rest go.) The "explanation" given on the notice Joe received is almost comical:
The agency says "We didn't allow the amount claimed as federal income tax withheld...because... supporting documents were not attached..." And yet, not only was a supporting document attached (Joe's Form 4852); and not only had the IRS (undoubtedly) received a W-2 from the same payer whose erroneous allegations on that W-2 are being corrected by Joe's 4852; but the agency DOES acknowledge having received supporting documents, by agreeing that at least the $7,927.00 was withheld. How otherwise did the agency arrive at $7,927.00, which happens to be exactly the amount discretely listed on Joe's supporting document and the W-2 sent to the agency by the payer as the amount of "federal tax withheld" (meaning, the amount withheld under the Chapter 24 "normal tax" deposit provisions)? Plainly the "explanation" given for excluding the Chapter 21 FICA withholdings is nothing but a pretense, and a shabby one, at that. By itself this phony explanation proves the agency has no valid ground for its behavior here. But here's where the gambit really stumbles: By acknowledging that Joe received no "wages", the agency has agreed not only that Joe received nothing subject to the "normal tax", but also that he received nothing subject to the FICA "surtax"-- because both fall on the same thing. The "normal tax" falls on all "wages" received, and the "surtax" falls on the first $118,500 of the same "wages". So, the United States has already admitted that Joe never actually owed any FICA surtax (just as Joe said on his form 4852 and by way of his return/claim for refund). It just wants to keep the money anyway. Thus, Joe's victory is a victory-in-progress. Joe has been handed flat-out admissions in favor of the remainder of his claim, even while the United States plays it sneaky and hopes Joe will let it keep a small bucket of his blood for the slaking of its thirst. THIS IS PRETTY OBNOXIOUS BEHAVIOR by the government. And it's a shame that Joe will still have to pursue the rest of his money. But that said, there's an upside to all this, in a way. This kind of game-playing by the feds illustrates and emphasizes with unusual clarity the liberating truth about the income tax. Deceptions and dodges are only resorted-to when the truth stands against you, making the government's very deliberate behavior here a particularly stark admission that the knowledge informing Joe's filing and claim is completely correct. CONGRATULATIONS, JOE! Hats off to you, for standing up for the law and the truth. We all owe you. *** P. S. Joe's latest victory joins those of the tens of thousands of other awakened and activated Americans represented here. It is another step toward the restoration of the Founders republic and the true rule of law. Don't you wish your victories were proudly posted, too? It's easy. Stand up on behalf of the law, and then share the evidence. That's all there is to it! Now, Let's Enjoy Some Straightforward Victories, Too Michael and Jean are a little belated in sharing these, but better late than never! MICHAEL AND JEAN PEETERS HAVE SHARED three victories recently, all secured in 2014 and concerning amounts withheld in 2013 and turned over to the feds, Colorado and Kansas. Unlike Joe's latest, these victories were complete from the get-go, without any fussing (aside from a brief balking by Kansas, which wanted verification of the "income" reported on Michael and Jeanne's federal filing, but after seeing that promptly issued the claimed refund). Enjoy:
Hats off to Michael and Jean, two awakened and activated Americans, like Joe and all the tens of thousands of others represented here. They, too, have taken a big step toward the restoration of the Founders republic and the true rule of law. Don't you wish your victories were proudly posted, too? It's easy. Stand up on behalf of the law, and then share the evidence. That's all there is to it! *** P. S. Why aren't Randy Barnett, Jonathan Turley, Bruce Fein, John Whitehead and other legal scholars and pundits writing papers about the knowledge and facts that have been steadily producing these fascinating, liberating, law-upholding and Leviathan-restraining events over the last 13 years? It's simple: They don't know of these things. If they have ever even heard of CtC, it will be only through DOJ propaganda designed to discourage them from looking for themselves and getting to the real story. You can help solve this problem. Find out how to contact these folks. Send them to this page and explain to them why they should set aside an hour to read it through. Doing this could make a big difference in your life, and for all of America. Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend
I Had A Great Meeting With Michigan's Attorney General's Office Last Week... Federal officials who break Michigan laws are just common criminals in the eyes of the state THIS PAST THURSDAY I HAD AN EXCELLENT HOUR-LONG MEETING with Carter Bundy, a representative of Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette. The subject was the investigation and possible prosecution of the federal judges and DOJ attorneys who have committed crimes against Doreen Hendrickson in violation of Michigan laws. Michigan, like every other state, criminalizes subornation of perjury, witness tampering and coercion committed by anyone upon anyone else. The state also criminalizes aiding and abetting any of these crimes. There are no exceptions in Michigan criminal law for government officials, whether foreign or domestic. Nor are there exceptions if the crimes are committed while "official duties" are purportedly being performed. In Doreen's case, of course, no actual "official duties" were involved at all. The crimes themselves were the objects of the acting officials. For instance, the subornation of perjury was itself the purported "official act" conducted when orders were issued attempting to control Doreen's testimony. Everything done to Doreen has always been pure crime, committed under the mere "color of law". A selection of Michigan statutes criminalizing coercion of false testimony can be seen here. As can be seen by a review of those statutes, what has been done to Doreen is a slam-dunk smorgasbord of blatant felonies in violation of Michigan law. I WILL ADMIT THAT FOR ME this approach to seeking justice for the criminal assaults on Doreen seemed a stretch. Not that it lacked anything in theory, mind-- indeed, the principle involved is about as straightforward as they come. In fact, the principle involved here is among the most basic in our American system of government overall: federalism. This is the division of power in this country into coexisting and competing (therefore countervailing) forces, with the feds holding the states accountable when they are abusive to citizens (something we are all very familiar with) and the states doing the same to the feds in return (something we see very little, but only because it has gone out of fashion, not because it isn't the way things are supposed to work). Nonetheless, I expected something of a "Huh? You've got to be kidding!" reaction from the state. Instead, there was no head-scratching or bemusement at all. Very gratifying. I'M PRETTY EXCITED ABOUT how this initiative can at least deter future abuses by arrogant and corrupt federal officials. In order to optimize the opportunity here, I'm asking everyone who feels the same to contact Michigan AG Bill Schuette's office and urge a quick decision in favor of prosecuting Doreen's abusers. Contact info can be found here. This is how it's supposed to work, people. It can be made to do so, if you help. "This balance between the National and State governments ought to be dwelt on with peculiar attention, as it is of the utmost importance. It forms a double security to the people. If one encroaches on their rights they will find a powerful protection in the other. Indeed, they will both be prevented from overpassing their constitutional limits by a certain rivalship, which will ever subsist between them." -Alexander Hamilton, to the New York Ratifying Convention, June 17, 1788* *Villain and poltroon though he was overall, here even Alexander Hamilton gets it right. Significantly, he does so as part of the argument by which ratification of the US Constitution was achieved. Thus, it is under this explicit construction and this construction only, as to this question, that the Constitution and the federal government which it brought into being can exercise authority. Any exercise of power by the federal government, or construction by any court on behalf of such an exercise, which is contrary to Hamilton's explanation here is without authority. P.S. Many thanks to my excellent friends Gordon Dye and Eric Bond, who helped make this meeting happen. Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend Post your comments on the article, people. Share it around. Submit it to Drudge. Let's make this a firestorm!!
Are the presentations and resources offered on this site and in my other work of any value to you? Tim Kendrick has posted a video on YouTube regarding donations. I didn't know what to do about it to begin with; I don't do what I do intending for anyone to feel obligated in any way. But of course, no one IS obligated. I will continue to make my work freely-available here, and in my books for only the cost of a cheap paperback. Thus, even though I post it here below, Tim's very thoughtful personal resolution and encouragement to others is just an invitation for consideration by those who may not be conscious of the fact that I can't do what I do without support. No one is to feel any pressure from it; if it moves anyone to act let it be solely because it seems right.
*****
Why Does The Government Lie About 'Cracking the Code'? THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION is the key to the restoration of the republic and the rule of law in America. See it below. (NOTE: It's very important that the entire 24 minutes be viewed.)
This video can also be found on YouTube at https://youtu.be/hgzzYl-eeUI. Here are links to the two pages to which viewers are directed at the end of the film: The Crime of the Century and The Truth About The 16th Amendment. The other two mentioned in the film are this one (the "bulletin board" stack of 1,200 or so posted refunds and other victories in knowledgably applying the law; and this one (the collection of resisted claims and the outcomes of those little battles). PLEASE be a real activist about sending this link to every single person in your address book, and about sharing it through facebook, reddit, twitter, and any other distribution channel with which you are familiar. Send it to every journalist you can. It's time to really make something happen. Accompany your emails and posts with with a strong admonishment to watch the film through, and that doing so will show the viewer an individual-empowering, state-restraining truth about the income tax which the government has been trying to keep hidden from view for 75 years and which that person really needs to know. BY THE WAY, as is impossible to miss, I have neither the skills nor the tools to make even moderately good films. This is simply not my forte. Anyone able to do better is encouraged to talk to me about that. As is ALSO impossible to miss, though-- even in my amateur production-- reader video testimonials have GREAT POWER. Send me yours. Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend How To Explain To A Pundit The Error Of His Ways Educated, grown-up American Brendan Trainor shares his excellent example
Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend A Patriot Activist Talks About CtC "McFloyd" on who got the tax wrong, and who gets it right
***** What's your answer?
***** How To Be A Leader In The CtC Community It's simple: KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX IN DETAIL KNOW WHERE TO FIND THE RESOURCES BE FAMILIAR WITH THE SCAMS, THE MISUNDERSTANDINGS, AND THE TROLL-POLLUTION TAKE CHARGE IN YOUR STATE FORUM, HELPING EVERYONE TO THINK CLEARLY AND STAY ON TOPIC All-in-all, just be the sort of person for others that you would go to yourself for trustworthy leadership. Leadership is a challenge. But it's not complicated, and you can do it.
Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend
True American Joe Black Testifies And Shares Victories For Liberty And The Rule Of Law ...as every American should... EDUCATED AMERICAN GROWN-UP JOE BLACK has stood up and acted to enforce the law upon its domestic enemies-- or, at least, upon agencies of the state whose operators seem to happily exploit ignorance and mis-apply the law at every chance for their personal benefit. Get inspired and encouraged by Joe's video sharing his spirit, his testimony and the acknowledgements he has secured:
Find more testimonial videos
here, and please, people, share these around as widely as
you can. To learn what, how and why to share your own testimony
(with or without mere practical victories to go along with the
far more important spiritual victories that are the real heart
of
CtC), click
here.
Care
to post a comment on this article?
Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend Two Simple Questions For Every Silent
"Alt-Media" Journalist The silence of these folks is the
liberation bottleneck. Maybe this'll help, if enough people
ask...
HERE'S A SIMPLE QUESTION: The income tax is, and always has
been,
an excise tax on privilege. This is established beyond any
controversy whatever by
repeated Supreme Court rulings, the words of the related laws,
and, over the last twelve years now,
hundreds of thousands of acknowledgements by federal and state
tax agencies.
You, like most folks, have been fooled into inadvertently
agreeing that your economic activities are exercises of
privilege, thereby allowing the tax to be applied to your
earnings. Why is this so hard for you to admit?
HERE'S ANOTHER SIMPLE QUESTION: You and everyone else being
fooled into agreeing that your economic activities are
privileged and thereby allowing them to be taxed is
what enables the flow of wealth that finances all the bad things
done by the state of which you complain in every column. Why
is this so hard for you to admit?
I GUESS THESE ACTUALLY LEAD TO A THIRD SIMPLE QUESTION: If you
really feel that all these things of which you complain are so
bad, why are you not helping more Americans understand the
nature of the tax and the ill effects of it being misunderstood
and misapplied?
Learn how and why you should ask every journalist in the
so-called "alt-media" these questions
here.
PRO TIP: By the
physics of the law, an indirect tax is necessarily a
privilege tax. Here's why: The distinction between a
direct tax and an indirect tax is incidence. A
direct tax arises by the direct imposition of the
taxer, without any election of the taxed (other than
that of authorizing the taxing power in the first
place). An
indirect tax arises by the taxed
choosing to to do
something by which the taxer's claim is then
created. The choice that is a valid object of an
indirect tax can't be anything done as an exercise
of an untaxable right. Nor can it be any activity of
necessity. A tax on anything done by necessity would
arise not by actual election of the taxed but simply
because the tax had been imposed by the taxer. Such
a tax, whatever it may be called, would be in actual
substance a direct tax, even if one that arose only
intermittently. Think of a tax on eating, for
example, or working, or engaging in trade with
others (all of which are things done by right as
well as by necessity, but you get the point). What is left as the
valid object of an indirect tax is the exercise of
privilege-- something done not by right, and
therefore done by the permission of the taxer (who,
due to being possessed of an ownership right in the
thing being permitted, is entitled to claim of
portion of the proceeds when the thing is profitably
used). "[Although the Legislature
may declare as privileges and tax as such for State
revenue purposes those pursuits and occupations that
are not matters of common right], the Legislature
has no power to declare as a privilege and tax for
revenue purposes occupations that are of common
right."
Sims v. Ahrens
The 'Watching the Watchmen Amendment' If you're not talking this one up everywhere and
helping generate a buzz, you don't really want liberty and the
rule of law... PRO TIP: The
argument that a concept explicitly given a statutory
definition for purposes of this or that chapter or
"title" has the same meaning as the common word the
legislature has borrowed for its label-- which
meaning plainly didn't suit the legislature's
purposes, hence its replacement-- is a preposterous
reading of the law. “It is axiomatic that the
statutory definition of the term excludes unstated
meanings of that term.”
Meese v. Keene “[W]e are not at liberty to
put our gloss on the definition that Congress
provided by looking to the generally accepted
meaning of the defined term.”
In light of
the actual evidence, those
who doubt or
deny the accuracy and correctness of
CtC just
because government officials make weaselly
representations against it are like the 16th-century Europeans who
were mystified by
Copernicus getting all those
astronomical predictions right even though the
church had said he was wrong.
****** NEW! Orders of twelve or more books now come with a free DVD containing six informative and inspiring videos-- 112 minutes in all. Click here for the details.
Do you have a victory to share? Click here to learn how to do so.
If you're working on one, and just getting stonewalled or speed-bumped, you can still be recognized! Go here to learn what to do. Learn The Liberating Truth About The Tax ***** Did you miss the 'Set Your Church Free' commentaries? Ignorance of the true nature of the "income" tax has gagged, gutted and seduced-into-disgrace America's ministerial community. This must change.
Copy and post this one around, people!
*****
Media Evasion Of CtC Must End, Now Time, unfortunately, is on the side of the well-funded disinformation specialists
Illuminating anniversaries of this week: July 8- In 1775, the
Continental Congress sends its final appeal to King George to
redress the colonists' grievances. The King pays attention as
respectfully as today's federal government does to the
Constitution. In 1776, the Declaration of Independence is read
aloud to the people of Philadelphia, and the Liberty Bell is
rung. In 2011, the United States Space Shuttle program runs its
final mission, and private operators take over providing
transportation services of this kind. In 2014, Israel launches
another pogrom against displaced and dispossessed Palestinians
trapped in the Gaza ghetto.
Are You Having Trouble Spreading The Word? SKEPTICISM (SOMETIMES INVOKED BY FEAR) IS TO BE EXPECTED when you're trying to explain to someone that everything they've been encouraged their whole lives to believe about something as entrenched and significant as the income tax is basically nonsense. So here's a way to help cut through the resistance: Ask your listener how he or she would react if you were to show an announcement from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue admitting that the tax doesn't apply to the earnings of most Americans and is misapplied most of the time because people don't understand how it works? Or how about if you showed a ruling from the Supreme Court saying the same? Now you just have to explain that you're going to show exactly those things-- but because the state really doesn't want people to know this, these things haven't been said quite as forthrightly as we would all wish. It's going to take a bit more work to take these admissions in than is sufficient for just reading a press release. But it'll be worth the effort... *****
Real Americans don't accommodate fog, lies and a sliding scale of adherence to the rule of law. Real American men and women stand up for the truth and the law, come what may, knowing that it is only by setting the bar at the top and enforcing it, come what may, that liberties are secured.
"Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated." -Thomas Paine
OUTREACH!!! JOB ONE, PEOPLE!!! SPREAD. THE. WORD. ONLY ONE THING WILL WIN YOU YOUR LIBERTY: Spreading the truth. Accordingly, I've assembled outreach resources into a new, dedicated page. Find it here, and please, USE THESE TOOLS!! I can't do this all by myself. "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -George Orwell *****
“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” -James Madison
How About You?
Are You Governing Yourself? Get The Knowledge, Reclaim Your Power, And Stand With The Founders
There is little more important to the long-term health of America than how our children are educated..
Some Observations Regarding Educated And Accurate Filing
Have You Taken A Military, Law Enforcement or Public Office Oath To Uphold And Defend The Constitution?
*****
'Don't Tread On Me' Polo Shirts Say It All!
*****
More Than Two Thirds Of The Several States That Collect "Income" Taxes Have Now Acknowledged The Truth About The Law As Revealed In CtC, And Have Issued Complete Refunds Accordingly! See The Following Chart...
'The BOSTONIAN'S Paying the EXCISE-MAN, or TARRING & FEATHERING' (1774) (How our forefathers responded to arrogant "Rule of Law defiers"...)
*****
HELP SPREAD THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident.” -Arthur Schopenhauer
Get your FREE* CtC bumper sticker and help spread the word! Just send a stamped, self-addressed envelope to Lost Horizons, Bumper Sticker Offer, 232 Oriole Rd., Commerce Twp., MI 48382 (*If you want to throw a few bucks into the envelope to help with costs, that'd be nice, but it's entirely optional...)
*****
"Taxes are not raised to carry on wars, wars are raised to carry on taxes." -Thomas Paine
Where To Find Things On This Site
Law Professor James Duane Says: "Don't Talk To The Police. Period."
*****
Films That Belong In Every Home Library
CLICK HERE TO INSTRUCT YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES
Ever Wonder How Much An Unrestrained FedState Would Like To Tap You For?
*****
Warrior David Larson shares this beautiful little farce, wryly observing that, "Depositors have "..not lost one penny.." - OK we could agree on that simple statement ..how about the purchasing power of that same penny 'not lost'?"
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
*****
Last Word
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." -Samuel Adams, Architect of the First American Revolution
OK, Now Back To Your Regularly Scheduled Programming:
Order Books, Warrior-Wear, or The CtC Companion CD
An "Income" Tax Related Site Map
E-mail this Newsletter to a friend
Want to get on the Newsletter mailing list? Just send an email from the address you want added to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with "Subscribe me" in the subject line, and your name in the body!
PLEASE CONTINUE TO DILIGENTLY SPREAD THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX!!!
*****
© All written and graphic material on this page and website are copyrighted by Peter E. Hendrickson, unless otherwise attributed |