"The preservation of a
free government requires, not merely that the metes and
bounds which separate each department of power be invariably
maintained, but more especially that neither of them be
suffered to overleap the great barrier which defends the
rights of the people. The rulers who are guilty of such
encroachment exceed the commission from which they derive
their authority, and are TYRANTS. The people who submit to
it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an
authority derived from them and are slaves….."
Btw, a copy of CtC from anywhere except the link above may not
be a current edition. CHECK. It matters.
***
The Dangerous Allegations Of Idiots And Scoundrels
...and an all-purpose, universal debunk.
LAST WEEK AN UNDOUBTEDLY WELL-MEANING CORRESPONDENT
sent me a .pdf version of an argument that the application of
the income tax cannot extend outside the boundaries of the
District of Columbia. The much-appreciated notion behind sending
the document was that the argument might help with
Doreen's circumstance.
Unfortunately, the scholarly-looking argument,
which is promoted at the websites of "SEDM (FamilyGuardian)",
"Freedom Law School" and others who prey on vulnerable people in
the "tax honesty" community, is a fraud. It is just another of
the many, many false artifacts infecting cyberspace and targeted
at those focused on the income tax issue in the hope of
distracting them away from
the actual truth about the tax.
THIS PARTICULAR FALSE ARGUMENT rests its
"territorial jurisdiction" assertions on provisions of 4 U.S.C. §
72 concerning the exercise of offices attached to the seat of
government, and excerpts from a number of Supreme Court rulings.
Most fundamental to the argument's intended point is the
following, which the authors excerpt from Caha v. United
States 152 U.S. 211 (1894):
“The laws of Congress in respect to those matters
do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but
have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places
that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national
government.”
This is deployed to suggest that the Supreme
Court is saying that the income tax laws "do not extend into the
territorial limits of the states", as here on SEDM (FamilyGuardian)'s
site:
"I know this is hard to believe, but the 16th
Amendment and Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code are
"special law" rather than "public law", which is to say that
they apply ONLY to federal territories over which the United
States government exercises exclusive legislative jurisdiction:
“A canon of construction which teaches that [sic]
of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply
only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”
U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222 (1949)
“The law of Congress in respect to those matters
do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but
have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places
that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national
government.” Caha v. United States, 152 U.S. 211 (March
5, 1894)"
(https://famguardian.org/Subjects/
Taxes/16Amend/SpecialLaw/16th
AmendIRCIrrelevant.htm)
The idea is that the "territorial jurisdiction" of
Congress only extends to DC and other enclaves within the
overall USA, and that the tax laws are "the laws of Congress"
being referred-to by the Caha court.
But in fact, in describing the canon to which it
refers the Spelar court is referring to "territorial
jurisdiction" as inclusive of
the several states and all US territories and possessions.
Spelar distinguishes this territorial jurisdiction only from
the territory of foreign countries over which the United States
has no sovereignty whatsoever,
delegated or otherwise (in this case, Newfoundland).
In fact, Spelar makes a very useful
observation in regard to the meaning of 'foreign" that needs to
be tattooed on the foreheads of every tin-foil-hat advocate of
"citizenship/residency" nonsense regarding the income tax:
See Mr. Justice Brown for the Court in De Lima
v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 1, 182 U. S. 180: "A foreign country
was defined by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall and Mr. Justice Story
to be one exclusively within the sovereignty of
a foreign nation, and
without the sovereignty of the United States. The
Eliza, 2 Gall. 4; Taber v. United States, 1 Story 1; The
Adventure, 1 Brock. 235, 241."
United States v. Spelar, 338
U.S. 217 at 222 (1949), fn. 5 (emphasis added)
As a
consequence of the delegation of certain powers to the federal
government,
some
federal jurisdiction extends throughout the entire USA--
federal territories, possessions and enclaves and the several
states included. Only places where there is no United
States jurisdiction-- which is to say, foreign countries in the
common usage of the expression, as opposed to any of the several
states, are "foreign" in the meaning used here by the Spelar
court, and in most usages in federal law. (See
this and
this for related material.)
The meaning ascribed to this excerpt from Spelar
is a falsehood. It is either false for being deliberately
misrepresented, or for being implicitly offered as a part of a
well-researched, trustworthy argument.
LIKEWISE, WHAT IS SUGGESTED by the excerpt from the
Caha ruling in the presentation above is also NOT what
the Caha court actually says. In fact, the excerpt is
deceptively pulled out of this actual passage in the ruling:
"Neither can it be doubted that the District
Court of Kansas had jurisdiction over a prosecution for the
crime of perjury committed at the place named in violation of
the provisions of Rev. Stat. § 5392. That section -- and under
it this indictment was found -- reads as follows:
""Every person who, having taken an oath before a
competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a
law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered,
that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that
any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate
by him subscribed is true, willfully and contrary to such oath
states or subscribes any material matter which he does not
believe to be true is guilty of perjury."
"This statute is one of universal
application within the territorial limits of the United States,
and is not limited to those portions which are within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the national government, such as the
District of Columbia. Generally speaking, within any
state of this union, the preservation of the peace and the
protection of person and property are the functions of the state
government, and are no part of the primary duty, at least, of
the nation. The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do
not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have
force only in the District of Columbia and other places that are
within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government. It
was in reference to such body of laws that § 2145, Rev. Stat.,
was enacted, and the argument which is sought to be drawn by the
counsel therefrom against the jurisdiction of the District Court
of Kansas has no foundation.
"It is enough that § 5392 has uniform application
throughout the territorial limits of the United States; that by
§ 563, the district courts are given jurisdiction generally "of
all crimes and offences cognizable under the authority of the
United States committed within their respective districts," and
that, by the Act of January 6, 1883, c. 13, § 2, 22 Stat. 400,
the territory in question was annexed to and made a part of the
United States Judicial District of Kansas."
Caha v. United States, 152 U.S. 211 (March 5, 1894)
(emphasis added)
Contrary to the assertions of SEDM and other
misleading will-o'-the-wisps infesting the "tax honesty"
community, Caha absolutely does NOT say that, "The laws
of Congress in respect to [taxation] do not extend into the
territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the
District of Columbia and other places that are within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the national government." The only
laws spoken of in the deceptively excerpted sentence from
Caha are federal police powers related to "the preservation
of the peace and the protection of person and property."
Every poor soul taken in by the
argument that the federal income tax only applies to "US
citizens" or does not extend, or cannot be enforced, inside
the several states should re-read all the above until this
dangerous nonsense is thoroughly purged from his/her mind.
This nonsense is the upchuck of idiots and the Kool-Aid of
scoundrels.
IN FACT, Caha says the opposite of what
the deceivers suggest, and expressly recognizes the
extension of the federal income tax authority throughout the
entire USA. This is because the federal income tax structure
hinges directly on the federal perjury statutes.
It's this simple: when a payment is reported on an
"information return" such as a W-2, a 1099, or a K-1, it alleges
every necessary prerequisite of qualification for that payment
to be a gain from a taxable activity. Thus, even if "US
citizenship" or "DC residency" or having been born during a
thunderstorm were actual requirements for the application
of the tax, the allegation of that thing is incorporated in an
information return report.
Unless and until such a qualified payment
allegation is rebutted it imposes the requirement on its target
of all its implications and consequences. There is only ONE
WAY to rebut such allegations, and that is by way of a signed,
sworn 1040.
The law is plainly stated:
"Provided, that any party, in his or her own
behalf, or as guardian or trustee, as aforesaid, shall be
permitted to declare, under oath or affirmation, the form and
manner of which shall be prescribed by the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, that he or she was not possessed of an income
of [the current personal exemption amount], liable to be
assessed according to the provisions of this act..."
Revenue Act of 1862, § 93
A sworn 1040 is the "form and manner" prescribed by
the Commissioner.
The only thing that really matters on a 1040 is the
amount of "income" reported. It is from the amount of "income"
(gains from federally-excisable activities) received that
liability for the tax arises.
As seen above, the language of the law does not
provide for declaring that one is not a "US citizen", or not a
"DC resident", or not born on a stormy day-- because these
things aren't relevant to the application of the tax. The only
thing provided for is a declaration that one didn't receive more
than the exemption amount of "income" liable to be assessed
according to the provisions of this act (which is to say,
excise-relevant income).
Anyone who believes such things can say in big bold
print on a 1040 (or any other instrument) that (s)he is not a
"US citizen", or lives in Texas, or was born on a sunny day.
None of that will mean or do anything.
An allegation of receiving "income" is an
allegation of everything
necessary for the presumption of liability for the tax, whatever
that might be. The only way that presumption can be rebutted is
by a report on a 1040 of a total "income" below the personal
exemption amount.
If a 1040 rebutting those "income" allegations is
not submitted once the person about whom they are made has been put
on notice, all those allegations
stand as proven. In the absence of that rebuttal those
allegations will not be arguable in any other time, place or
manner.
And here's the kicker, and why Caha--
read honestly and not as false support for pet theories or deliberate
dis-information to divert Americans from
the true path to understanding the tax-- actually supports
the legal USA-wide application of the tax: 1040s must be signed
sincerely, under penalties of perjury.
As the
Caha
court says, the perjury statutes have USA-wide application, and
therefore the declaration-based structure of the "income" tax is
jurisdictionally-viable throughout the same range. An allegation
can be made (in DC, if you like, but anywhere, really), and
unless a rebuttal is made on a sworn, sincere 1040, the
appropriate tax will be deemed due and owing.
That tax
will be collected in whatever way is possible. This could mean
seizing American-located assets of a Frenchman living in Paris
about whom an unrebutted allegation of federally-taxable
"income" was made, or seizing the property of a Texan found in
Dallas or in a foreign bank which bows to the will of Uncle Sam.
SO, HERE'S THE BOTTOM LINE. There are lots of efforts being made
out there to keep more Americans from learning
the actual truth about the income tax. Many of these efforts
involve a pretense of dedication to "tax truth" coupled with
attractive, often simple and silver-bullet-ish assertions about
the tax which are tarted-up in seemingly serious, scholarly robes.
Being taken in by any of this nonsense will
cause harm of lesser or greater degree. It might mean merely
being kept from learning the truth for a while or it might mean
being led into making bad filings (or none), and letting
presumptions of liability become established, or improperly
withheld amounts go un-reclaimed.
Spreading this nonsense will entrap others, and
ensure that the actual truth about the tax faces a much more
skeptical audience both among those predisposed to the subject
and those predisposed against it.
Don't be fooled. READ EVERY CITED CASE FOR YOURSELF, with a
skeptical eye.
Or, for the much, much simpler and safer approach, follow this
easy rule: If you didn't (or don't) see an assertion concerning
the tax in
CtC or my other books, or in something else I have written
on the subject (such as here on
losthorizons.com), it is either irrelevant to the tax,
outright wrong, or both.
***
P. S. SOME FOLKS WILL FIND the harshness of my
expression, "idiots and scoundrels" off-putting or
inappropriate. Let me explain:
The excerpt of the Caha ruling is a
deliberate deceit. It was
done in knowledge of the larger passage from which it was
deceivingly teased out for use in support of something Caha
does not support.
Or, the misrepresentation of Caha was done
by someone who didn't even bother to read the case, and just
came across the snippet excerpted by someone else. This person
then presented their offering with the manifest intention that
it be taken as the product of careful, competent and honest
research. This plainly is not true, and just as much a
deliberate deception as the first possibility.
Both of these same things can be said of the use
made of Spelar.
These are not honest mistakes. They are deliberate
deceptions, and they have surely done harm to people who have
been misled thereby.
In any event, they must be presumed to have been
meant to do harm. Why else engage in such deceptions?
If anything, my use of "idiots and scoundrels" is
too kind.
***
NOTE: Various ISPs have been blocking my emails off
and on over the last few months. If you are a newsletter subscriber and you do not
find a newsletter or mid-edition update email in your inbox on
any given Monday, please let me know, and demand answers from
your service provider at the same time.
IF YOU'RE OLD ENOUGH, you'll remember the
once-upon-a-time-ubiquity of this observation. 25 years ago it's
what would have been said with a shrug by virtually every
American if told about the refusal of anyone to bake a
gay-themed cake for a wedding.
The same response would have been prompted by
anyone's refusal to bake a Nazi-themed cake. Or by anyone's
decision to serve a gay-themed cake at a wedding, or to serve a
Nazi-themed cake. There might have been some eye-rolling
accompanying that response in one or all of these cases, but no
one would have said that any one of these choices should be
prohibited by law.
Most especially, no one would have said that anyone
should be punished by the government for refusing to eat a piece
of either cake, or refusing to have such a cake at a wedding, or
refusing to bake either cake. To even propose any such thing
would earn suspicion about one's qualifications for American
citizenship.
AND YET, SOMETIME NEXT MONTH, Masterpiece Cakeshop,
Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission is due to be argued in
front of the Supreme Court. The case is that of a private
business standing up against an oppressive state bureaucracy
which is trying to punish it for insisting that America is still
a free country.
How disgusting that this matter wasn't thrown out
along with the bad law on which the Colorado Civil Rights
Commission proceeds by the first court in which it appeared. The
essence of the state bureaucracy's argument is that it has the
authority to compel someone to serve another's interests, or, to
put a finer point on it, as though the gay applicants for
Masterpiece Cakeshop's labor have a right to that labor--
a right to compel the baker to perform at their command, or as
though Masterpiece Cakeshop is a public utility.
The applicants do NOT have that right. That's not
how rights work. And Masterpiece Cakeshop is NOT a public
utility, under a duty to provide cakes to all who ask.
TO CLARIFY THE FIRST POINT, there is no such thing
as a "right" that compels action by someone else. Human rights
("individual", "natural" or "sovereign" rights) are rights to
act which are possessed by each person individually.
Examples include the right to speak or refrain from
speaking, the right to travel, the right to acquire, use and dispose of
property, the right of self defense and the means to secure it,
the right to associate with those of one's choice, and so forth.
All inhere in the humanity of each individual, are above and
beyond the authority of any other person or any aggregate of
persons-- including those styling themselves as "governments"--
and are exercised by each person at his will without hindrance
or permission by anyone.
As our foundational American legal instrument puts
it: "[A]ll men are...endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable rights..."
One key characteristic of human rights is that they
are possessed by every single person ("[A]ll men...") in equal
measure,* and another is that being unalienable, any or all of
them can be exercised by every single human being
simultaneously. These characteristics illuminate what the nature
of such rights must be.
For instance, a compulsion imposed on one person by
another cannot be the exercise of a human right. Obviously, such
a "right" cannot be exercised simultaneously by everyone, or in
concert with everyone else exercising which they will of their
own rights freely.
Those being compelled are being thwarted in
the exercise of their rights by the compulsion, meaning that
while the compellers may be said to have rights, the compelled
cannot be. Thus, the compulsion is not an exercise of a right,
and there can be no such thing as a right to compel.
Human rights are, in fact, rights of freedom from
compulsion. Human rights require INACTION by others-- they
require each to refrain from hindering another in the exercise
of any or all rights; that is, to respect the unalienable
character of those rights.
People have no rights TO things, such as the
provisions of any goods, services or attitudes by others. Human
rights are rights FROM things-- such as hindrances and
compulsions.
AS FOR THE SECOND POINT, Masterpiece Cakeshop is
NOT a public utility. It is not financed by contributions it
compels from all persons in its region, and thus is under no
duty to equally serve all contributors who come through its
doors in the same way in which it serves any of them.
Masterpiece Cakeshop is a private person who
presents into the market as available for hire if the terms are
acceptable to both parties. It is not a slave commanded to go to
the town square and do whatever is asked of it by any comer.
Masterpiece Cakeshop can no more be properly
commanded to sell its services to any given party than it can be
commanded to buy its ingredients from any given party. Only
fascists would argue otherwise, and they would be wrong.
AT ONE TIME, 999,999 out of any given
1,000,000 of your neighbors would have said, "Hey! It's a free country!"
when presented with a cakemaker's choice to make one kind of
cake and not another. It's up to us to remember our founding
principles and revive that oh-so-American refrain.
Let Nazis go to Nazi cakemakers for their pastries,
and let Masterpiece Cakeshop tell Nazi customers to go to hell,
if that's how it feels. Anything else is an outrageous violation
of our fundamental law.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according
to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of
others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’, because law
is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates
the rights of the individual."
-Thomas Jefferson
"He that would make his own liberty secure must
guard even his enemy from oppression."
-Thomas Paine (1795)
***
*Equality under the law just means everyone is
equally entitled to protection in the exercise of his or her
rights. It doesn't mean that everyone is entitled to be treated
the same by everyone else.
ED FROM PENNSYLVANIA shares a refund of a local mis-application
of the tax:
***
And VINCENT AND SHELLY T.'s (quirky) notice of
their latest victory for the rule of law is now posted:
I say quirky because this notice declares
only a victory-in-progress.
Vincent and Shelly's claim was for the full amount listed in
this notice ($17,026). The IRS acknowledges that the couple
received no "wages" or "income" under any other name (and
refunds the normal tax accordingly), but is still taking a shot
at keeping the FICA surtaxes collected from them, even though
those also only arise upon the receipt of "wages" everyone
agrees were not received...
It's a shame that bad apples in the IRS sometimes
make things difficult for good people like Vincent and Shelly.
But of course, no sensible person expects liberty to always come
easily.
ANYWAY, HATS OFF to Emily, David, Ed, Vincent and
Shelly!
These good Americans have all stepped up and acted
to restrain the dangerous and corrupt state and uphold the rule
of law, something desperately needed from everyone.
Emily, David, Ed, Vincent and Shelly's victories
join those of the tens of thousands of other awakened and
activated Americans represented
here, and constitute more critical steps toward the
restoration of
the Founders republic and the true rule of law.
Don't you wish your victories were proudly posted,
too?
*I don't really know the exact numbers of these
latest posted victories, only that they are likely to be at a
minimum somewhere in the neighborhood indicated, and actually
likely to be a good deal higher. See
this for the calculation factors, which you can apply for
yourself.
I assign the numbers as I do in the title of this
post in order to make a point-- whatever the exact numbers are,
they are enormously large, and represent a hugely important and
utterly unique sustained series of events in American history.
And yet, the vast majority of Americans KNOW NOTHING WHATEVER
ABOUT IT.
How can this be? Doesn't ANYONE reading these
newsletters and familiar with these events know a journalist?
The degree to which this all goes unremarked just
boggles the mind. I hope and pray that this silence, this
muffling of the liberating truth, ends soon, and I ask any of
you that can help to please do so.
A Complement To Rod Schmidt's False IR
Criminal Complaint
This one is in hope of preventing the issue in the
first place...
CHARTERED FINANCIAL CONSULTANT Tom Bottaro has
shared a nice template for a letter informing ignorant
1099-creators about the real purpose and effect of those forms.
Included, of course, are a few words about the possible
downsides of recklessly making 1099 allegations when the facts
don't fit...
REAL AMERICAN TONY JACKSON
shares his ten years of victory-winning experiences after many
years in the "tax-honesty" desert before finding
CtC:
***
DON LA VIGNE, another long-time warrior and real
American grown-up, shares a nice and
inspiring testimonial on what
CtC
has done for him for over nine
years now:
A review of important goings-on today and over the
next few weeks.
THE VIDEO OF MY JULY 16 PRESENTATION on judicial
fraud to conceal the true legal character of the income tax is
posted here.
Everyone should see it and share it like crazy.* It is hugely
powerful and WILL successfully educate even the most stubbornly
skeptical and disengaged.
Video of the Q&A session that followed that
presentation can be seen
here;
this is also a "must see".
*Here's a sample formulation for sharing:
The American people have been victimized by
massive and sustained corruption in the federal
judiciary in order to fuel the ambitions of the Deep
State. See the incontrovertible evidence at
https://youtu.be/105GKdmJ9HU.
This enormous harm can be remedied, but the
path to that solution begins with widespread awareness
of the problem. Please watch the film yourself, and
please pass this wake-up call along as widely and
urgently as possible.
NOTE: If YOU
haven't shared
this film with any given judge, prosecutor or
attorney, he or she will not have
ever seen any of the information presented. He or she
will not only know nothing of the truth about the tax, but will
believe the untruths about the tax which the falsifying
officials exposed in the film (and in the text treatments of
the same material
here and
here) have been peddling on behalf of the "ignorance tax"
scheme.
Don't make the mistake of imagining that "they all
know the truth, and are part of a giant conspiracy against it."
This is not true.
Most of those folks have never seen even a single
one of the authorities you have seen in these presentations.
They never knew there was a reason to look for them.
Certainly none of them have never seen this material
knowledgeably assembled and presented.
YOU have to show it to them. If you haven't done
so, assume that no one has.
***
ON SEPTEMBER 13 I'll be speaking at the Elks Club in Livonia,
Michigan. Visit
OneIfByLand.org for more information.
ON OCTOBER 4, I'll be
speaking to the Washtenaw County Libertarian Party, in Scio
Twp., Michigan. Contact Jim Hudler at (734) 475-9792 for more
information.
***
CLICK
HERE to sign the petition calling on Speaker Paul Ryan to
initiate impeachment proceedings against federal judges who have
lied in official proceedings as revealed in the presentation
discussed above. (If Ryan chooses to wallow in the swamp and
does nothing,
the petition will be re-directed to all members of the House
individually. In the meantime, feel free to send the petition
link to your own congresscritter and get him or her warmed-up.)
Please sign, and share
the link and this request around, by tweet, reddit, tumblr,
facebook, whatever. Be creative and
don't confine yourself to just one community of interest.
Judicial fraud is a "crossover" issue, of equal interest to
everyone.
"Like a
muddied stream or a polluted fountain is the righteous man who gives
way before the wicked."
-Proverbs
25:26
"A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves."
CAN YOU EVEN IMAGINE how abysmally
stupid someone would have to be to continue to doubt or deny
that
CtC has revealed the actual, complete and insurmountable
truth about the income tax in light of the overwhelming
mountain of
historical,
legal,
practical and
logical
evidence to the contrary? (Not to mention the
outright lies and even
ludicrous hoaxes the executive and some corrupt members of the
judiciary have been caught at in desperate efforts to conceal
the truth...)
Plainly any such denier must either be abysmally
stupid or be an abysmally corrupt government official or other
person who sees him or herself as benefitting from the lies
about the tax by which America has suffered for 75 years now.
Isn't this true?
I HOPE NOBODY OUT THERE
is tolerating a single
CtC
denier anywhere within the "tax honesty" or "activist"
communities. Such people-- and they are definitely out there, flogging their
pet
tin-foil-hat theories-- are the millstone around the neck of
the rest of us, keeping the truth about the tax from getting the
audience it needs in order to bring about the transformation of
the American landscape
which it is uniquely capable of doing.
Nor should anyone be
tolerating denial, either implicit or explicit, by any lawyer,
accountant, journalist, judge, elected official or bureaucrat.
"Denial" by any of these types is collusion and corruption, or
rank cowardice at best.
MORE, DENIAL OF THE
OBVIOUS AND STATE-RESTRAINING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX might have a
sinister aspect, as well. The State, whose growth and power are
made possible by the lies about the tax which the deniers
enable, is the mechanism by which some exercise control over
others through the application (or credible threat) of violence.
The bulked-up State, in
short, is the means by which some rule others. The
larger the State, the more successfully it rules, and the more
easily it can brush aside or overpower Constitutionally-based
objections to its edicts, exploitations and abuses.
I don't personally
imagine a long-running, deliberate and closely-controlled effort
to subjugate the American people. I discuss this in the
"Interlude" portion of
CtC, as many of you will recall, where I argue instead that
the only large-scale and long-running "conspiracy" in America is
a soft one-- a coincidental conspiracy of interests.
In my view America
suffers from Adam Smith's "invisible hand" in reverse: the evil
effect of many individuals unwisely entrusted with too much
power who, in using it to look out for their own interests
individually, work a massive harm to society.
But the growth of the
State unquestionably serves to create the tool by which
deliberate subjugation could be accomplished. Indeed, the
overgrown State made uniquely possible by the misapplication of
the income tax is the ONLY means by which the American people
could be subjugated.
And who knows? Maybe I'm
wrong in my view, and those seeing a darker picture are right.
Warrior Rick Van Camp
recently shared with me a few words from that darker perspective
which ends with a key point that is just as cogent whether you
see Leviathan growing among us for the one reason or the other:
In 1913 Woodrow Wilson stated: “Since I entered
politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me
privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the
Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They
know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so
watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they
better not speak above their breath when they speak in
condemnation of it.”
And this continues today. When opportunistic liars
like Al Gore can make hundreds of millions from outright lies
and manipulation of Science while producing a "carbon footprint"
of at least 100 people, when a treasonous dog like Obama can
plot the overthrow of an elected President in Public and get
away with it without a whimper from the so-called Press, or the
Congress; when tens of millions of "Americans" can vote for a
continuation of nanny-state entitlements while allowing their
children to be indoctrinated by those who would continue them as
children, when a once-proud and independent people submit
reflexively to a militarized State army of (now armed)
bureaucratic functionaries who grope their women and young
daughters in airports and soon bus and train stations, invade
their homes on the slightest pretext (more than 50,000 SWAT
raids last year) and terrorize, injure and sometimes murder
innocents...
That organized, subtle and watchful power is HERE,
among us, and in your face. And YOU pay for it.
YOU PAY FOR IT. That's the big point.
If you're a
CtC denier, it doesn't matter whether what's going on is grayish or
pitch-black-- either way, YOU'RE PAYING FOR IT.
I don't mean, "You're paying the price, sweetie". I
mean YOU ARE PERSONALLY FINANCING WHAT IS BEING DONE TO YOU AND
TO YOUR CHILDREN AND TO THIS WONDERFUL COUNTRY. And you're doing
so voluntarily, and in most cases, simply because you refuse to
learn or accept what
CtC
has revealed. In a word, you're daft.
And as for "official" and "professional"
CtC
deniers, you're the ones keeping the lie going to which the daft
succumb. There's a word for that, too. Despicable.
"It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief,
if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in
society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the
chastity of his mind as to subscribe his professional belief to
things he does not believe he has prepared himself for the
commission of every other crime."
-Thomas Paine
***
LITTLE BIT OF A P. S. on this article: I have to
cut a pass to a lot of folks out there not yet embracing
CtC
and acting on its revelations to help transform America. I'm
talking about the huge majority of folks who have never heard of
any of this, or who have only seen the lies and smears and
pretenses of "official" resistance to
CtC
(such as are discussed
here,
here,
here and
here).
These folks effectively serve as
weight on the deniers' side of the scale-- and also finance
the Beast-- because I haven't been able to get my videos or
other liberation information to them. I'm talking about your Uncle Jerry (or Aunt Sally,
or Junior, or your buddy Sam, or whoever).
I haven't been able
to get my liberating information to these folks because I DON'T KNOW THEM.
I have no contact info,
and I wouldn't know the best way to speak to them, even if I did.
YOU have to speak to these folks, and introduce and
share the material. Think about it. When was the last time you
forwarded one of my videos around to everyone in your address
book?
Do you not do it because you don't think your
family, friends and acquaintances would be interested? You're
wrong. Last autumn 62,979,879 Americans voted for Donald Trump
in the hope that he would restore the republic. Plenty of people
are interested in freedom and the rule of law.
In a minute you're going to watch Arron Reeves'
wonderful video on his awakening to the truth about the tax, and
what that means to him. Are you going to share it as widely as
the next Kardashian video will get shared? I hope so.
It is because that DOESN'T get done that "official"
deniers get away with it. I want you to think about that.
Do you want to get to where you don't have to file
claims for the return of your property at all, because it never
got diverted in the first place? That will happen the moment
that my videos get a million viewings in a few weeks like some
do, instead of struggling for a year or more to reach a few
thousand. It won't happen before that.
The "official" deniers can control a slow burning
fire. Our fire has to get vigorous, and only you can make
that happen.
An old joke, but in regard to this deceiver, not a
laughing matter at all.
““When principles that run against your deepest
convictions begin to win the day, then battle is your calling,
and peace has become sin; you must, at the price of dearest
peace, lay your convictions bare before friend and enemy, with
all the fire of your faith.
Looking For A Litigator Who Wants To Do
Well While Doing Good
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT presents details of a long-running (and
still-ongoing) violation of the speech, conscience and due-process
rights of two Americans. The
offenses, in a nutshell, involve a federal district court attempting
to dictate to these two folks-- word for word-- sworn "testimony"
they are ordered to make in a legal contest with the
government.
Click the link below to read the brief. You'll find
it thoroughly supported with relevant
testimony by the chief perpetrator and other similarly unambiguous
exhibits.
"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did
and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit
to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which
will be imposed on them, and these will continue till they have been
resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of
tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they
suppress."
-Frederick Douglass
"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an
irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds
of men."
…The US may be the only
country in the world where people working in the
non-federal private sector must commit perjury in
order to owe and pay ‘God’s things to Caesar’?
If you work in the private
sector, stop falsely swearing that your
private-sector earnings are federal “income”1.
Perjury is a crime. Exercise the law’s provision
for protecting your private-sector earnings from the
154-year-old2 indirect excise known as the federal
income tax. Rebut fraudulent allegations made by
your payers regarding the legal nature of your work
and the earnings derived therefrom, so that you pay
only your fair share. Join the hundreds of
thousands of honest, law-abiding Americans who have
been doing so for more than a decade. Learn how for
free at losthorizons.com.
1--“We must reject… …the
broad contention submitted in behalf of the
government that all receipts—everything that comes
in—are income…”.
United States Supreme
Court, So. Pacific v. Lowe, 247 U.S. 330, (1918)
2—The income tax in the
United States was first instituted into law on July
1, 1862, during Lincoln’s presidency under the
excise laws of the United States. The preamble to
the 1939 Internal Revenue Code traces its roots to
this original income tax law.
Trolls Against The Truth: A
Dis-Information Campaign
UNLESS YOU'VE LOOKED, you can have no idea of
the volume, intensity and mendacity deployed in the
government's efforts to discourage Americans from learning
what is revealed in
CtC.
It's truly astonishing.
A lot of folks are aware of the show-trial events
in which my wife and I have received state-engineered public
beatings meant to scare people away from the truth about the
"ignorance tax" scam. But many are unaware of the overall
campaign. This is a shame, really, because a focused propaganda
effort like this one is a very powerful acknowledgement of the
significance of
CtC's
revelations.
While the majority of Americans do not yet know how
CtC
protects them from the vampire state, the vampire itself
certainly does. Dis-information campaigns like this one make
that very clear.
FORMER CBS REPORTER SHERYL ATKISSON describes some
aspects of this sort of dis-information campaign in the
following video. Despite
the annoying preliminary 15 seconds or so of advertising,
her presentation is very much worth watching:
((H/T to Greg Belcher for finding
and forwarding this great presentation.)
Losthorizons.com is one of those websites
specifically-targeted by the corrupt interests at Wikipedia
described by Atkisson. The behind-the-scenes folks at that
site won't allow links on their pages to anything posted at
losthorizons.com, nor even just text corrections of
misinformation in their pages about the income tax.
That's the least of it. Click
here for some specific discussion of the enormous
scare
campaign that's been actively spreading false information in
hope of discouraging legitimate media attention, as well as
men and women simply seeking the truth about the tax and
liberty from the scourge of the "ignorance tax".
PLEASE GIVE SOME SERIOUS THOUGHT to the fact
that YOU being secure in your own freedom rests on others
learning the truth as well, and recognize that it falls to
you to help overcome the dis-information campaign. Post and
share
your videos;
share your victories; help silence the
agents-provocateur and distraction-injectors whose nonsense
is discussed and debunked
here; and widely (and frankly, impatiently) share
this page,
this page and
this page, challenging everyone in your address book to
disconnect the phone and the TV for an afternoon and get
educated.
Doing these things will be what makes it
happen, Cap'n.
An Excellent New Video About The
Government Effort To Suppress CtC Has Hit YouTube!
DEREK CUSHMAN HAS POSTED a powerful presentation on
government lies, propaganda and misinformation about
CtC
designed to discourage more Americans from reading the book and
getting free of the misadministration of the tax:
Watch it and share it, folks. This film will help a
lot of people who have been taken in by the lies understand how
they've been manipulated, and prompt a proper desire to learn
the truth about the tax.
Well done, Derek!
P.S. If there were a thousand videos out there
debunking government lies and encouraging Americans to learn the
truth like this one does, the "ignorance tax" scheme would
collapse in a month. So, where's yours?
Please Help losthorizons.com Be As
Effective As Possible!
OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS I've heard from a
number of folks that a firewall known as "Comodo" blocks
access to this website. This is apparently a glitch in
that program. This site is safe, as can be seen by going
here.
Please share this info with others in your own
address book so it gets around-- obviously those suffering
the ill effects of this defect in Comodo won't be able to
see it here themselves until they go into their firewall
settings and manually whitelist
losthorizons.com.
ALSO!!! Please
go to the trouble of sharing the email you got alerting you
to this new newsletter posting with as many people as
possible.
Over the course of time the ISP I use (Yahoo)
is periodically put on "spam" blacklists. If I do a sending
of newsletter announcements during such an interval, my
address can get tagged that way, too, and my email can then
end up disappearing into spam folders in the email systems
of what are actually newsletter subscribers. Unless told to
look for them and whitelist mail from @losthorizons.com,
some of these folks won't ever know that this has happened.
Pasted below are some how-to guides for several
of the more popular email programs. Yours might be listed;
if it is not, these steps might guide you through doing the
whitelisting anyway, since there will be basic similarities
among programs. Failing that, your program's "help" files or
online info should be able to walk you through the
whitelisting process.
Yahoo:
There are two things you can do:
1. Check your Yahoo! Bulk folder. If you see
email from losthorizons.com, highlight it and click Not
Spam.
2. Create a filter to automatically send email
from losthorizons.com to your Inbox.
Click Options in the top right navigation
bar.
Select Mail Options from the list that
drops down.
Choose Filters.
Click the Add button.
Choose the "from" field to match in the
incoming message.
Choose "contains" for the criterion.
Enter @losthorizons.com.
Then choose the Inbox as the destination
folder.
AOL:
To make sure email gets delivered to your AOL
inbox, you must add @losthorizons.com to your Custom Sender
List.
Click the Spam Controls link on the lower
right side of your inbox screen.
When the Mail & Spam Controls box appears,
click the Custom Sender list link.
Choose the Allow email from ...
(@losthorizons.com) option.
Click Add.
Click Save.
AOL Web Mail:
If you are using AOL web mail, simply reply to
an email from losthorizons.com.
Hotmail Live, Windows Live or MSN:
Either,
Check The Junk Folder: If email from
losthorizons.com is in this folder, click Show content to
view the body of the email. Click Mark as safe.
Or,
Manually Add to Safe List:
Click Options in the upper right corner of
your Hotmail screen.
In the body of the page under Junk e-mail
click the link Safe and blocked senders.
Click the link Safe senders.
Enter @losthorizons.com.
Click Add to list.
Gmail:
Click the Show search options
downward-pointing triangle in your Gmail's main search
field.
Type @losthorizons.com under From.
Follow the Create filter with this search
›› link at the bottom of the search sheet.
MY FRIENDS, THIS NEWSLETTER NEEDS your
creativity, your clear thinking, and your expressive energy!
In short, this newsletter needs your journalism!
I know that writing for public consumption
isn't everyone's cup of tea. But those who CAN string a few
words together can importantly serve the educated, activist
community by writing and submitting thoughtful,
well-researched and persuasive articles on certain topics
for posting on these pages.
Here are several topics for which submissions
are desired:
Why the media is silent about the
astonishing 13-years-and-counting history of government
acknowledgements of the accuracy of CtC's revelations
and its simultaneous efforts to keep Americans from
knowing about those revelations.
Why educating more Americans about the true
history and actual provisions of the income tax is the
most important thing that anyone seeking to restrain the
state and restore the republic can do today.
Why "tax honesty gurus" stay mum about CtC
and its unprecedented accomplishments in freeing people
from improper application of the tax.
Why hunkering down in every-man-for-himself
silence in the face of statist and fascist assaults on
the rule of law leads to greater harm than what is
hunkered-down against; that is, how
fearful behavior just strengthens the thing feared.
How much better it is to encourage (and
practice) bravery, honesty and openness than to counsel
(and succumb to) fear, lies and concealment.
Articles should be 1500 words or less, with
working titles and author's name at the beginning.
Composition should strive for two and three sentence
paragraphs organized in the form of a theme paper. Intend to
persuade and inspire, not browbeat. Format should be either
.doc or .odt. All submissions selected for posting may be
subject to editing.
Submit to the regular (non-encrypted) address found
here, as an attachment to an email.
BTW,
CtC Warrior Greg Sutton has just had a good
educational/inspirational article published
here.
In Passing... Three cheers for Russia, which
has stepped up to join Iran in aid of its long-time ally Syria
against the noxious "Islamic State" nutcases that have sprung up
like toadstools in the wake of the destabilization of the Middle
East by the noxious neocon nutcases running Washington for the
last 15 years.
More Educated Americans Testify,
Showing Why The Deep State Fears CtC
"If the taxpayers of this country ever
discovered that we operate on 98% bluff, the entire system
will collapse."
-Reported remark by an internal revenue
service officer to Sen. Henry E. Bellmon (R. Okla.) on April
15, 1971.
"The Tax Code represents the genius of legal
fiction... The IRS has never really known why people pay
the income tax... The IRS encourages voluntary compliance,
through FEAR."
-Jack Warren Wade Jr., former IRS officer in
charge of the IRS Nationwide Revenue Officer Training
Program, in his book ‘When You Owe The IRS’
CtC-EDUCATED, AMERICAN HERITAGE-LOVING grown-up
Joe Black shares his testimony here. Tom Romin shares his testimony
here.
Greg Sutton shares his here.
Enjoy Robert Harvey's testimony
here.
Joe's,
Tom's and Greg's and Robert's words, like those of others
that can be found here, are solid examples of why the Deep State fears
CtC.
It's this simple: If you study
CtC you will know the truth about the tax.
Further, you will know that you know the truth,
beyond any doubt.
ONLY
CtC will give you that certainty, because
CtC is exclusively and uniquely complete and correct, as
can be seen by any of thousands of different
acknowledgements of every possible kind, from
this to
this to
this to
this.
Most telling, in its own way, is the government
robotically resorting for years now to the strawman of
falsely ascribing to CtC the ridiculous arguments that
"wages are not income" and that only federal, state and
local government workers are subject to the tax. This false
ascription is then used as the basis for claiming the book
is "false and frivolous"-- a lame and transparent dodge
begging the question of why the state won't acknowledge what
the book
REALLY says and then attempt to dispute THAT.
Once you know the truth revealed in
CtC, acting in accordance with that truth WILL liberate
you from being an ignorance tax serf. This, the deep state
fears mightily.
FURTHER, ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT
deeply-known truth can NEVER legitimately qualify as any
kind of a "tax crime", or for any penalties or fines. This
is not only because what
CtC teaches about the law and the tax is technically and
legally correct, but also because all tax crimes are crimes
of "intent" and all penalties rest for their legitimacy on
"intent".
An educated filing in sincere accordance with
what is known and believed to be true and correct cannot be
lawfully treated as invalid, criminal or subject to penalty.
Any effort by the state to claim otherwise is inherently
corrupt.
Nor can any accurate and truthful filing be
overcome by any lawful means, which is why the state is so
focused on forcing Doreen to declare that she doesn't
believe what
CtC teaches, with the openly-declared hope that her
doing so would discourage other Americans from acting on
what they also believe.
In short, the "ignorance tax" scheme can only
survive if Americans can be bluffed into not seeking out the
truth, and if those who learn that truth can be discouraged
from acting on that truth.
But those who know the truth, and know
they know the truth, cannot not act.
Acting on the truth is a moral imperative, as
well as a legal imperative.
The undaunted actions of those who know the
truth are "calls" against the bluff. Each "call" ratchets-up
the spread of the truth exponentially and forces state
acknowledgement of that truth, one way or another; and each
such acknowledgment takes America one step closer to
freedom
from the 75-year state-unleashing, people-restraining
"ignorance tax" scheme.
I HAVE DONE MY BEST to lead this country to
liberty from the mis-applied income tax. I have labored
hard. I've shed a lot of sweat, a fair bit of blood and more
than a few tears. But I seem to be pretty poor at that kind
of work.
When I have asked all of you for
what I firmly believe is a necessary resource to
move the ball downfield and give all
of us the best chance at justice and an end to the
assault on the rule of law-- simple testimonial videos
requiring nothing from any of you but the phone in your
pocket and three minutes of speaking from the heart-- I have
had only a handful of people answer my call.
I CAN'T KEEP GOING THIS WAY. I have to be able
to turn my attention away from writing new persuasive or
skepticism-addressing articles week after week, and toward
research, analysis and educational presentations that will benefit everyone already in
this community. I need time to do some suing, and to bring
together the resources and talent toward that end.
As said, it is my firm belief that your
testimonial videos are the resource that I need to make big
things happen, and they are unquestionably the thing I need
to allow me to turn my attention away from trying to get
horses to drink at the waterhole to which I have led them.
Your words, in your great numbers and all in your own
different ways, will do that better than anything I write
possibly could.
And yet, you are not providing them. This,
despite my having been asking you for them for many years
now.
Therefore, with enormous reluctance, I am
making portions of this website restricted access only. People
have been urging me to do this for years now, telling me I
should impose a charge to access my work-product, so as to
enable me to keep producing.
I have never been inclined to
charge fees for access. I ask for donations, and will continue to do that,
and if they do not come, then I will conclude that my work
is of no value to anyone, and I will close shop.
But I now WILL charge a special something for
access to some key portions of that work-- testimonial
videos, as discussed, described and demonstrated
here.
SELECTED PAGES CONSTITUTING
primarily "legal resources" pages now require passwords for
access, and to get a password, I need your video. Similarly,
if an email comes my way asking for guidance or assistance,
it had best have a video attached, if I don't already have
yours posted.
I hate to play it this way, but I want to
win.
I'll tell you a story from when I was coaching
my kids in soccer. Both of my kids at a certain age in their
careers had run into a wall common to all but the very
exceptional. They had gotten to be pretty good, and they
wanted to enjoy the benefits of their hard work. But the
arrival of this interest coincided with a new
self-consciousness which made them reluctant to risk failing
and looking foolish. So, they were hanging back from seizing
the main chance when it appeared, and driving for the goal.
My solution was to post on the wall of our
dining room a couple of simple points about self-discipline,
the chief of which is this: You can't score a goal if you
don't take a shot.
That's how it is here, too. If you don't stand
up, you are laying down, and you'll never score that goal.
Here is what my kids live by now, in their own
version of that lesson. I hear it from them all the time as
they excel (accompanied by the sound of a father's breast
swelling with pride): Go hard, or go home.
You, too. Go hard, or go home.
Send those videos.
Do I ask for a lot? I want your victories to
post, your financial support, your efforts at spreading the
word, and your beautiful faces and inspiring words, too. It
IS a lot.
But I'll let Thomas Paine explain:
"Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered;
yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the
conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too
cheaply, we esteem too lightly. Heaven knows how to put a
proper price on its goods; and it would be strange indeed,
if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly
rated.”
We each have our reasons, and our story. It's time, and it's
needed, for you to share yours with the world.
"The day we see truth and do not speak is
the day we begin to die."
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
What does it for you?
Is it simply because no moral and upstanding person has any
choice when it comes to telling the truth over his or her
signature, whether on tax forms or anywhere else?
Is it recognition of the critical importance of the rule of
law, and the knowledge that if everybody leaves its
caretaking to someone else, it will soon be lost to us
completely?
Is it the money?
Maybe it's just simple respect for your own rights as a
human being, who is not and cannot be not involuntarily
subordinated to others?
Maybe it's just simple respect for your general civic
responsibility to be the grown-up and enforce frugality and
restraint on a big, powerful creature of our own devising
which otherwise is like a badly-raised teenage boy given
whiskey and car keys and let loose on the road to wreak
havoc?
Or is it, perhaps, a more acute anxiety that if our bonfire
of a state isn't damped, and quickly, it'll soon burn down
the house around us all?
What IS it that firms up your jaw and stiffens your resolve?
It's time to take off the bushel and share your light!
I would like you to think about what it is that motivates
you for a few moments (or all day, if you like), and then
send me your thoughts. I want to put YOUR reasons to work
inspiring folks who don't yet understand what this is all
about.
In this day and age, the most effective way for you to share
your thinking for the benefit of others is to video-record
yourself talking about how you feel, and explaining what
inspires and motivates YOU.
All you need is a webcam or cell-phone equipped with a
camera. If you don't have, or know how to use, one of these,
have a friend help.
If needed, write a little script for yourself. Better,
though, to just speak extemporaneously, after spending a
little time sorting out your thoughts and getting down into
your heart. Perhaps make it a video of someone in your
family, or a close friend, interviewing you.
Keep yourself to no more than 2 or 3 minutes, and keep in
mind that the purpose is not to educate, but to INSPIRE,
ENCOURAGE and ENERGIZE. Your video will be one of many to be
shared.
You needn't feel any obligation to be profound, and you
shouldn't try to explain anything about the law, other than
to say that you have read it and you know it's on your side.
You just need to be sincere, and uplifting. Your object is
to make your audience want to have what you have, and to be
where you are in your heart.
Keep in mind that you're speaking to an audience that
doesn't yet know ANYTHING about the subject, and whose first
reaction is, "This must be illegal; this must be dangerous;
this is too good to be true." You want to pull that audience
right past such things, and straight to a focus on truth,
morality, and our American heritage of liberty and the rule
of law.
Remember: INSPIRE, ENCOURAGE, ENERGIZE.
Speak about rights. Speak about morality, and the obligation
of a grown-up and responsible person to speak the truth and
to enforce the Constitution. Speak about everyone's duty
to give to God what is God's, always, and to Caesar only
what is really Caesar's. Speak of your obligation to
respect yourself, and to look out for the current and future
well-being of your children and your fellow citizens. Speak
of
CtC, and what its information has done for your
understanding and resolve. Show the book.
If you have had victories, describe them. Better still, show
them, if possible.
Be clear about just what you accomplished: EVERYTHING back--
Social Security, Medicare and all; a "notice of deficiency"
closing notice; an on-paper agreement or acknowledgment that
your earnings weren't subject to the tax and everything
withheld or paid-in was an "overpayment"; a transcript
showing all $0s; or whatever happened.
When you speak of state victories, name the state. If you
had to overcome balkiness from a tax agency before winning
any victory, describe that, too!
If you're in a battle now, speak of your resolve to uphold
the law, come what may. If you haven't yet begun to act,
speak of your decision to do so, and your plans.
Remember, your purpose is to INSPIRE, ENCOURAGE and
ENERGIZE.
If you're dealing with ongoing balkiness, describe that,
too, if you wish-- but be sure to explain why you're not
discouraged, and why you are not standing down, not slinking
back into the barn, and not choosing to endorse the lies.
Mention what you do for a living, whether you're a doctor,
homemaker, lawyer, trucker, IT guy or gal, or a retiree or
student. Help people understand that the company of grown-up
activist Americans they are being invited to join cuts
across all demographics and all interests-- with the common
denominator being respect for the law and love of the
principles on which this great country was founded.
This is your chance to get a LOT accomplished.
We've all had frustrating occasions of trying to explain all
this to a friend, neighbor, family member or co-worker, only
to pile up against the wall of a mind not yet ready to
listen and learn. Here is your chance to address a
self-selected audience of folks who have themselves decided
that it's time for them to begin paying attention, and have
clicked on your testimonial for exactly that reason.
Further, think about this: You want judges, bureaucrats, CPAs, lawyers, the HR
people where you work, your pastors, your neighbors and everyone
else to acknowledge the truth about the tax openly and
straightforwardly. How and why would these folks do this if YOU
won't?
You want these folks to learn the truth. Why would
they even recognize that there is a truth to be learned if you
won't attest to having learned it yourself? You've got to stand
up, face forward and chin up and tell these folks that you have
studied and checked and verified and seen the evidence and seen
the government evasions and you know that the tax is not the
capitation that the beneficiary government wants everyone to
think it is but a benign, but strictly limited thing, and that
they need to study and learn that, too.
Again, if you have victories to show, that's nice, and
powerful, too. But you don't have to have victories to display
in order to declare your knowledge of what the law says. I've
never flown around the world, but I've seen the evidence and
considered the arguments, and I'm not hesitant to declare it a
sphere...
Even those of you who haven't yet studied
CtC have surely read
this short document, and have verified everything
in it for yourself. You should therefore be declaring its
veracity and its message, loud and proud. Again, if you won't
say it, how can you hope that others will ever even bother to
look at the facts?
Be the change you want to see in the world,
or there won't be any change.
So, please make and send those videos right away! You can
share them with me via a cloud-based drive space like
OneDrive.Live.com or GoogleDrive, or mail DVDs to me at 232
Oriole St., Commerce Twp., Michigan 48382, or even email to
me if each file is no more than 20 megs (and you can break a
video up if need be-- I can reassemble them). Render as .mpg
or mp4, if possible; if not, send them how you have them and
I'll make them work.
Remember, the
restoration of institutional respect for individual rights
and the rule of law depends on enough individuals insisting
upon it. Do your part to let those starting to rub the sleep
from their eyes know that there is a community already
waiting for their fellowship with open arms and open hearts
and shining spirits.
See how some of your fellow warriors for the truth have done
their parts in videos sent over the years, many of which are
posted
here.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing
that ever has."
Getting Free Of The "Income" Tax Scheme Is As Easy As Falling
Off A Bike
To get an idea of how today's "income" tax scheme works, try
this little exercise:
Think of the federal government as a guy named Bob, who lives
down the street from you in a town that is really big on
bicycles. Bikes get used for commuting, deliveries, shopping,
etc.. In fact, other than walking, bicycles are the exclusive
form of transportation in your town.
Your neighbor Bob has a by-the-mile bicycle-renting business--
"Bob's Bicycles". Bob's Bicycles is far and away the biggest
business in town.
Part of Bob’s success is because he does a lot of contract
business. However, Bob doesn't just get paid by riders who have
signed an agreement with him, or even just those using Bob's
bikes. Bob gets something every time anybody in town does any
riding at all, through an odd combination of circumstances that
took many years to come together.
Here's how it happened...
Bob's Bicycles was launched long ago by the great grandfather of
the present Bob (Bob IV). Great Grandpa Bob started out not only
with a main location for his contract business-- he also had the
bright idea of setting up spots around town where he parked some
of his bikes for use by the more occasional rider, on an "honor
system". Anyone could take and use one of these bikes, but they
were expected to keep track of their mileage, and send Bob a
"1040 Mileage Ridden/Rent Due Form" (and the appropriate rent),
periodically. The initial design of the form was like this:
I, ______________,
rode a Bob's Bicycle a total of _____ miles this
year.
At Bob's rental rate
of $.15 per mile, I owe Bob $______
I said that Great Grandpa Bob planned to deal with these
occasional riders on the "honor system", and that's true. But he
liked his money, too, and didn't want to miss anything that was
due him. So, after setting up the "self-serve" locations, Great
Grandpa Bob went around handing out "W-2, 1099 or K-1 Rider
Reporting Forms" to every other business in town. The forms--
accompanied by notices that if Bob didn't get his rent from
someone riding a bicycle in connection with any business, he
would sue the company involved-- said:
You Can’t Fight Well When You Don’t Know
What You’re Fighting About
If
you are having an argument with the IRS or any other tax agency,
You are NOT being presumed to have made “corporate profit”.
You are NOT being alleged to have received “foreign income”.
You are NOT entangled in an invisible “adhesion contract”.
You are NOT being obligated by a law whose subject is never
identified.
You are being targeted because REAL EVIDENCE exists that YOU
PERSONALLY HAD “INCOME” to which the revenue laws apply--
even though that evidence is almost certainly incorrect, and CAN
be corrected.
CtC WarriorSanDiegoScott has put together a great little
20-question quiz to test your knowledge of the law regarding the
United States "income" tax. Test yourself, test your friends and
family! Test your accountant and tax attorney, and help them
learn the liberating truth!!
"Never must thou take up a false cry, or join hands with the
guilty by giving false witness in their favor. Never must thou follow with
the crowd in doing wrong, or be swayed by many voices so as to give false
judgment; even pity for the poor must not sway thee when judgment is to be
given."
-Exodus 23:1-3
Doing A Little High-Payoff Math
If each person receiving this newsletter each week distributed as
few as 100 of any of
the great outreach tools featured here to co-workers, friends,
neighbors and family members (or just strangers on the street, in
the mall, etc...), we could have SEVERAL MILLION new
Americans suddenly introduced to the liberating truth about the tax!
Just like that! In one week!
C'mon, people, let's roll on this!
“Most of the important things in the
world have been accomplished by people who have kept on trying when
there seemed to be no hope at all.”
When directed to a page by topic or link, read everything.
I know that this can mean the investment of a lot of time, attention
and effort, but although some may imagine otherwise, I don't write
as much as I do because I can't think of any other way to spend my
time...
Furthermore, when you encounter a hyperlink within, or associated
with, the text you are reading, follow it!
It is pretty common these days for web-based material to be littered
with hyperlinks. Sometimes the purpose is to provide definitions or
examples, in order to ensure that folks reading the original
material aren't presented with a word or reference which they don't
understand. Sometimes the links lead to illustrations pertinent to
the original text.
It is common-- and perfectly understandable-- for folks who are
confident that they are familiar with language or references within
the main text they are reading to get in the habit of skipping over
included links. I do it all the time, myself!
However, I very rarely include links for definitional or explanatory
purposes; and when I DO make a link out of text in one page it is
generally to another self-contained page, rather than merely
illustrative material. These other pages contain material the clear
understanding of which I deem highly important for the proper and
complete understanding of the original page. (Links to
CtC, the
Victories pages,
CtC Warriors and so on are obvious exceptions to this general
rule. On the other hand, a link to the victory
Highlights or 'Every
Which Way But Loose' pages, which might seem like such
exceptions, are not. The special selection of victories on those
pages, and the filed docs and tax-agency correspondences included
therewith, themselves constitute highly instructive material which
merits careful attention. Thus care needs to be taken in all cases.)
Please make a habit of clicking on all provided links and at least
looking briefly to ensure that the linked page is one with which you
are completely familiar from another study session.
Finally, please keep in mind that, annoying though it may seem at
first blush (but not, I trust, upon reflection), I constantly tweak
material already posted. Obviously this doesn't mean that every page
is in flux at all times, but it does mean that if you are directed
to a page that IS familiar, it's worthwhile to read it through again
if it's been a while since your last having done so.
To comment on any article in this update (or to read
comments of
others), click on the
below.
(I(It may take a while for your newly-posted comments to
appear; also, please understand that this is NOT a place for posing
questions about individual tax situations.)
below.