C'mon! CtC can't be right! You're crazy!

If CtC were actually right,

it would mean the government's been concealing and denying the truth for years on end,

and everybody knows THAT would never happen...

***

So, It Seems To Me...

and I'm just spitballin' here, you understand...

...BUT IT SEEMS TO ME that any IRS person responsible for posts or publications like the one highlighted in this doc, or any judge responsible for any ruling stating, or even just reflecting, the falsifications presented there (or in the new "brief" format here), are vulnerable to the following:

18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years...

(Rather bizarrely and very intriguingly an exception is listed in subsection (b) for knowing and willful false statements or representations to a judge or magistrate by parties to a judicial proceeding or such a party's counselor. One simply has to wonder what that's all about... Still, there are no exceptions for the magistrates or judges themselves for making false statements.)

I think that vulnerability is enormously enhanced by ensuring that the person of interest has been put on notice of the material in this doc, or this simpler presentation, or this more in-depth presentation. Those with occasion to be filing a brief might want to make use of the material as newly presented here.

It also seems to me that any US Attorney who failed to take a reported offense to a grand jury and push for indictment would risk being seen as guilty of aiding and abetting... And further, it seems to me that there could be no immunity in regard to "knowing and willful" torts and crimes.

SO, FINALLY, it seems to me that everyone should be asking themselves who they know who's serving on a grand jury at the moment? Or who works as a US Attorney? Or as a journalist?

Make some noise.

BTW, don't misunderstand. I know perfectly well that the law cited above looks as though it is meant to deter or punish witnesses and such who might be inclined to present false things in trials or other "official" proceedings.

But this law is NOT actually confined by its terms to those targets, not by any means. And the falsifications discussed here with which these comments concern themselves are unquestionably criminal, and unquestionably of grave import.

Further, there is a rule of statutory construction that says when Congress has specified exceptions, as in this case, there can be no others, however reasonable or important they might seem to be. Don't let your thinking be boxed in.

And also btw,

Get the upcoming Tenth Annual Declaration Day Party on your calendar! It'll be Sunday, July 2, here in beautiful Commerce Twp., Michigan! Click here for RSVP info. See you then!!

And btw too, with Declaration Day coming up for everyone whether with us or not, I'd like to remind you all of the new Pledge of Allegiance, and encourage its use wherever you are:

(Get this pledge as a .pdf here.)

“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

– Martin Luther King Jr.

Care to post a comment on this article?

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

*****

The Latest Victory Posts

A Warrior's fourth victory in 12 months; a debut victory; and a courteous IRS addition of overlooked SS and Medicare withholdings to a refund claim!claim!

BRIAN WRIGHT, WHOSE MICHIGAN REFUND FOR 2016 graced this page two weeks ago (just as his Michigan and federal refunds for 2015 did a year ago), is now able to share his refund of everything withheld from him and given to the feds during 2016-- Social security, Medicare and all:

Here is the filing that produced Brian's latest victory for the rule of law. Here, too, is something else Brian asked me to post: Note To The Community.

***

BEN FROM CALIFORNIA joins Brian for accolades today, with his first victory-- a complete refund from his home state of everything withheld during 2016:

Here is the filing that secured Ben's victory for the law, and the California notice concerning his claim.

***

FINALLY, YOUNG WARRIOR DESIREE STUMO shares her first victory in enforcing the rule of law, and does so with the nice symbolic touch of a "Rogue One" T-shirt:

Not a lot of money being recaptured, but that's not the point. What matters is to whom that money really belongs, and whether the rule of law will prevail in America, or whether we'll only have whatever suits the state.

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE to this small refund story than even just the critically-important matters of principle and power mentioned above. In Desiree's case a really notable and unusual respect for the law played out, and this time I'm not talking about Desiree's respect for the law.

You see, this young lady made a monetarily tiny, but practically very significant mistake on her filing. When entering the amount of federal tax withheld on line 64 of her 1040, Desiree neglected to add the amounts withheld for Social security and Medicare surtaxes to the amount withheld under the generic expression "federal income tax".

Desiree should have done so. ALL of these are federal income taxes, and if one didn't receive the "wages" on the alleged basis of which nominal federal income taxes get withheld, then one didn't receive the "wages" on the alleged basis of which the FICA taxes can properly be withheld.

It's a very forgivable mistake. Doing an educated filing for the first time can be a bit nerve-wracking, and just knowing that one has to be looking out for special terms on the forms, and that to a very great degree those forms are designed to mislead, can itself result in being misled.

NOW, NORMALLY A MISTAKE LIKE DESIREE'S is happily capitalized on by the IRS (literally). The agency just keeps what has not been reclaimed, despite surely being cognizant of the error, and that the FICA amounts are not owed. It is then rudely left to the claimant to go to the trouble of filing an amended return to get the rest of his or her money back.

But not this time. This time the IRS took a step up from the basement in which it usually conducts its affairs. Like an actual servant of the public, someone at the agency took it upon him or herself to correct Desiree's calculations by adding the withheld Social security and Medicare taxes to her claim and cutting her refund check for the whole amount.

Here is Desiree's filing. Look at the withheld amounts on the 4852s, the refund claim on page 2 of the 1040, and the amount refunded on the check proudly shown above by this fine young American grown-up.

I say "Hats Off!" to this unknown bureaucrat. He or she has proven that real Americans can be found even where one might least expect (or that people in the agency have been paying attention to what they, too, have had the opportunity to learn over the last 14 years).

AND, OF COURSE, HATS OFF to Brian, Ben and Desiree herself. Gotta love all of these heroic Americans!

Brian, Ben and Desiree have stepped up and acted to restrain the dangerous and corrupt state and uphold the rule of law, something desperately needed from everyone. Their victories join those of the tens of thousands of other awakened and activated Americans represented here, and are more critical steps toward the restoration of the Founders republic and the true rule of law.

Don't you wish your victories were proudly posted, too?

It's easy. Stand up on behalf of the law, and then share the evidence.

That's all there is to it!

"Be the change you want to see in the world."

-Mohandas Gandhi

Care to post a comment on this article?

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

The U.S. Income Tax: An Excise On The Profitable Exploitation Of Federal Privilege

The U.S. Ignorance Tax: The Profitable Exploitatioof Confusion About The Income Tax

The Biggest Snow-Job In World History: The Myth That 1913 America Adopted A Marxist Progressive Tax On "All That Comes In"es In"

“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

-James Madison

A Review of CtC by Derek Cushman

You can also find this film at https://vimeo.com/175424277.

If you're working on one, and just getting stonewalled or speed-bumped, you can still be recognized! Go here to learn what to do.