(Click on the underlined text to jump to each feature. To
return, use your browser's "back" button or the provided "Return to
Contents" links. Please keep in mind that
many more items of interest are to be found between featured
articles, so your most profitable course is to scroll through the
whole page...)
Folks STILL aren't taking this seriously enough, so...
October 14- In 1066, Norman invader
William the Conqueror wins the Battle of Hastings over the Saxons, gaining
control of England. In 1322, Robert the Bruce wins Scotland's independence from
England. In 1884, George Eastman patents paper-strip photographic film. In
1926, Winnie-the-Pooh is published. In 1943, prisoners at the Nazi death-camp
at Sobibor rise up, killing guards and breaking out of the camp. About half
escape. In 1947, Chuck Yeager breaks the sound barrier in level flight in a
Bell X-1 jet. In 1962, the Cuban Missile Crisis begins when a U-2 spy-plane
spots Soviet missiles being installed in Cuba. In 1968, the United States DoD
announces that 24,000 Vietnam vets will be re-rotated back for second tours of
duty. In 1968, Jim Hines becomes the first man to run 100 meters in under 10
seconds. In 1982, Ronald Reagan launches the federal assault on liberty and the
Constitution known as the "War on Drugs". In 2012, Felix Baumgartner performed
a 24-mile skydive, reaching an estimated speed of 843.6 mph before deploying his
parachute.
Anniversaries of interest for
each day of this week will be found throughout the newsletter
below.
Please don't just
read what I post here (or anywhere), and nod your head sagely or
approvingly and then move on to other things. I don't post in order
to affirm your sense of things. I post in order to equip you with
perspectives and arguments with which to
educate others, and in the
expectation that you will forward my posts to other people (or
direct them to those posts). PLEASE do those things,
especially in recognition of the fact
that my posts are heavily suppressed. They will NOT get out
if you don't get them out.
Remember, we won't win by only YOU knowing what I
present. We will win by LOTS OF OTHERS knowing what I present.
***
BTW, join me on The Shields Report
the first Saturday of every month at 5PM EDT!!
...because, still, folks don't seem to be grasping what
I've been trying to make clear about this ruling.
FOUR MONTHS AGO, the United States Supreme Court
issued the most significant statement about the income tax it
has made in 108 years. This statement revealed-- and slapped
down-- false declarations about the nature of the income tax
made for decades now by lower courts, government lawyers and the
IRS. Those false declarations assert that the tax is a
capitation (a type of direct tax) which has been relieved of the apportionment requirement imposed on such taxes by
Article 1, sec. 2, cl. 3 and sec. 9, cl. 4.
This false doctrine about the tax, which has been
the basis for countless misapplications of both the tax
directly and of penalties associated with the income tax, was
supported by-- indeed, rested entirely on-- a contrived
misreading of the landmark, unanimous ruling on the meaning and
effect of the Sixteenth Amendment by the Supreme
Court in Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR. Co. 240 US 1
(1916). That contrived misreading holds that the ruling says
exactly the opposite of what it actually does.
LET ME SAY THIS AGAIN:
For the last 80 years or so, federal and state tax agencies, tax
courts, district courts and appellate courts have systematically
misapplied (and misenforced) the income tax based on a
completely false reading of tax law, which the US Supreme Court
just corrected-- unanimously and unambiguously-- this past June
in its ruling in Moore v. United States. Is this
clear enough?
Champagne corks should have popped all across the
nation.
At the least, those corks should have popped in
every household in which the true nature of the tax is known--
which is to say, in every household to which these newsletters
find their way.
While many other households were watching the
Moore case intently just out of interest in the controversy
over the application of the tax to what the Moores argued to be
untaxable gains from their foreign corporation, and were
disappointed in the Supreme Court's upholding of that
application, the CtC-educated community should have focused
entirely on the statements by every member of the court-- both
in the majority opinion and in concurring opinions and
dissents-- correcting the false "direct non-apportioned tax"
doctrine.
That correction, after all, makes the question of
whether the tax can be applied to gains not yet realized as cash
entirely irrelevant to most people, since it puts into focus the
far more important question of whether any given gains are
income-tax-relevant at all, whether realized as cash or not.
Further, that false-doctrine-correction extends this far more
important and utterly fundamental question across the entire
spectrum of income tax applications, from the most mundane to
the most exotic.
And yet, somehow this earth-shaking fact is going
unremarked, even despite my having now devoted three lead
newsletter articles to the Moore bombshell.
PERHAPS THIS DISREGARD is a matter of the many
distractions attendant upon a divisive campaign season, the
ongoing genocide in Palestine and the massacres now being
committed in Lebanon, as well, the Ukraine debacle, and the
ever-greater danger of a life-ending World War III as a very
possible outcome of the United States fanning the flames in both
regions.
Kinda valid, I get it...
But in light of the fact that it is the systematic
misapplication of the income tax over lo, these many decades
that has enabled the bad behavior underlying all those
distractions:
...that restoring the lawful application of the tax
is the key to ending them:
...and that a failure to end them risks the death
of us all:
...I think the wise will pull their eyes from the
distracting threats and devote their attention to the solution
which has just been handed to us all in a once-in-a-lifetime
event possibly even deliberately offered by a court which is
itself conscious of the monster its long-standing toleration of
lower-court error has nurtured and which now threatens to
consume us all.
SO, TO RECAP: For eight decades, government
attorneys and lower court judges have been lying about what the
unanimous Brushaber ruling from 1916 establishes as
true about the meaning and effect of the 16th Amendment and the
about the legal nature of the income tax. Those servants of the
revenue-hungry state have falsely claimed that Brushaber
rules the tax to be a non-apportioned direct tax.
This false claim has enabled tax agencies to apply
the tax as a
capitation generally, through the exploitation of victims
ignorant of the truth. It has also been used by the courts to
disregard all the provisions in the law which inconveniently
contradict such applications of the tax, and which reflect the
legislators' accurate understanding of the tax-- such as those
requiring the government to prove that activities to which the
tax is being applied are actually excise-taxable, distinguished
activities-- whenever the matter has been litigated by people
aware of the truth.
The Supreme Court has just issued a big, "NO!" to
that long-standing, pernicious false claim about Brushaber
and the nature of the tax.
This is a hugely-important thing.
Read the detailed discussion of all this in the
article below-- perhaps, with the help of the foregoing, more
usefully this time than was possible when I first posted it two
weeks ago.
Back Again To Moore
...because folks don't seem to be grasping what
I've been trying to make clear about this ruling.
ON AUGUST 15, 2024, A TAX COURT JUDGE, Ronald L.
Buch, ruled against a
student of my book, 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth
About Taxation In America' (CtC) in a litigation over an
IRS Notice of Deficiency. CtC is the book in which
I reveal the long-hidden truth about the legal nature of the
income tax. I also explain in CtC how the tax has been
successfully misapplied on a massive scale for decades; what
victims of the scheme can do to make things right; and why all
of this is so important to the health of our now-deeply-wounded
Constitutional republic.
Buch made his ruling, in part, with the
following language summarizing the student's key contentions and
then archly dismissing them out of hand:
"Mr. ____ offers only frivolous arguments in
response to the information in the Commissioner’s documents,
arguing ... that [sic] income tax is an excise tax, it cannot be
imposed as a non-apportioned direct tax under the 16th
Amendment, and liability only can result in relation to taxable
activities. We have addressed these frivolous arguments in
Waltner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2014- 35, affd, 659 F.
App'x 440 (9th Cir. 2016), and we need not address them further.
See Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417, 1417 (5th
Cir. 1984) (“We perceive no need to refute these arguments with
somber reasoning and copious citation of precedent; to do so
might suggest that these arguments have some colorable
merit.”)."
This language, and the snarky dismissals of the
argument that the income tax is an excise, rather than a
non-apportioned direct tax, and can only fall upon a
distinguished class of taxable activities, is in harmony with
not only the cases cited by the tax court, but many other lower
court rulings over the last several decades, such as these:
“[T]he income tax is a direct tax,... See
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1, 19,
36 S.Ct. 236, 242, 60 L.Ed. 493 (1916) (the purpose of the
Sixteenth Amendment was to take the income tax "out of the class
of excises, duties and imposts and place it in the class of
direct taxes").”
“The Supreme Court promptly determined in
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Ry. Co., 240 U.S. 1, 36 S.Ct.
236, 60 L.Ed. 493 (1916), that the sixteenth amendment provided
the needed constitutional basis for the imposition of a direct
non-apportioned income tax.”
For decades the IRS has published and distributed
in hard copy and, more recently, maintained on websites, the
same claims about the Brushaber decision, and the nature
of the income tax, as those shown above. For instance (fifth
entry on
this page):
Contention: The Sixteenth Amendment does
not authorize a direct non-apportioned federal income tax on
United States citizens.
Some assert that the Sixteenth Amendment does not
authorize a direct non-apportioned income tax and thus, U.S.
citizens and residents are not subject to federal income tax
laws.
The Law:
The courts have both implicitly and explicitly
recognized that the Sixteenth Amendment authorizes a
non-apportioned direct income tax on United States citizens and
that the federal tax laws as applied are valid. In United
States v. Collins, 920 F.2d 619, 629 (10th Cir. 1990), cert.
denied, 500 U.S. 920 (1991), the court cited Brushaber v.
Union Pac. R.R., 240 U.S. 1, 12-19 (1916), and noted that
the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that the "Sixteenth
Amendment authorizes a direct nonapportioned tax upon United
States citizens throughout the nation."
All pretty grim for that student of
CtC and his
"tax is an (indirect) excise which can't be imposed as a
non-apportioned direct tax under the 16th Amendment, and
liability can only result in relation to taxable activities"
argument, right?
Well, no, not really.
Three months ago, as though quoting
CtC
itself in every particular, the US Supreme Court unanimously
declared that,
The Civil War income tax was recognized as an
indirect tax “under the head of excises, duties and imposts.”
Brushaber, 240 U. S., at 15; see also Springer v.
United States, 102 U. S. 586, 598, 602 (1881).
In 1895, however, in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan &
Trust Co., this Court held that a tax on income from property
equated to a tax on the property itself, and thus was a direct
tax that had to be apportioned among the States. 158 U. S. 601,
627–628. The Pollock decision sparked significant confusion and
controversy throughout the United States.
Congress and the States responded to Pollock by
approving a new constitutional amendment. Ratified in 1913, the
Sixteenth Amendment rejected Pollock’s conflation of (i) income
from property and (ii) the property itself. The Amendment
provides: “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect
taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without
apportionment among the several States, and without regard to
any census or enumeration.” U. S. Const., Amdt. 16 (emphasis
added).
Therefore, the Sixteenth Amendment expressly confirmed what had
been the understanding of the Constitution before Pollock:
Taxes on income ... are
indirect taxes that need not be apportioned. Brushaber,
240 U. S., at 15, 18.
The excerpt above is from the majority opinion; the
concurring opinions and even the dissenting opinions in the case
all echo this declaration. J. Jackson's concurring opinion goes
a bit further, expressly describing the tax as applied in the
case as "an excise tax on the privilege of doing business
through a controlled foreign corporation".
Jackson's addition puts a finer point on the
Moore court's acknowledgements, underscoring that because
the tax is an indirect excise it cannot be a
capitation, which is a tax on all that comes in (or some
portion thereof) simply because it comes in, and is expressly in
the category of direct taxes. (Click on the link and learn the
meaning of this often misunderstood term.)
Further, because the tax
cannot be a capitation, and therefore can only fall on distinguished,
special varieties of "what comes in", and because it
is an excise tax (as the Brushaber court also
holds expressly), it is necessarily and inescapably a tax on the
specialized category of gainful, privileged activities (measured
by the dollar value of the gains therefrom), because an
excise tax IS
a privilege tax. (Click on the link and learn the meaning of
this often misunderstood term.)
Following from these two facets of the Moore-affirmed
nature of the tax is the fact that in order for the government
to validly establish tax liability (in the face of a
properly-made dispute thereof) it must show that any
gains by which it proposes to measure such a liability are the
product of qualifying privileged activity. (That requirement is
expressly specified in tax law, but has been routinely ignored
by courts in denial about the excise-character of the tax.)
ALL-IN-ALL, THE DECLARATIONS IN MOORE are
rather strikingly different from the
assertions of all the lower courts (and the IRS) cited above,
and especially that obnoxiously snarky one made in the
ruling against that CtC-educated
filer with which we began, right? In fact, the Moore
court unanimously says exactly the opposite of what those lower
courts have said-- while being exactly what CtC
has told you is the case, in every particular, since
way back in 2003.
The fact is, rather than operate from their own
research-- even when presented with chapter and verse by a
disfavored litigant-- those lower courts have relied upon
government-serving wrongly-decided prior lower court decisions.
Such decisions form an ever-more massive chain that began with
one long-ago case, apparently badly briefed, and argued before a
corrupt judge and against a corrupt DOJ lawyer-- very possibly
with the deliberate connivance of all parties involved-- and
which was never appealed for correction.
That first case was then cited in the next case
involving an ill-prepared litigant against the government, with
the bad decision echoed and then perhaps affirmed in a circuit
court. Those outcomes will have been widely published into the
legal community of the day (by then some years removed from the
Brushaber decision, which is, sad to say, written by a
Chief Justice White who was fond of 100-word sentences and
circuitous reasoning sure to discourage impulses to verify) and
will quickly have become the reigning precedent.
And yet it is, and always has been-- as the
Moore decision now re-instructs the country-- a steaming
pile.
SO, TO SUM UP, THE SUPREME COURT just unanimously
bitch-slapped every tax court judge who has ever
made an adverse ruling against an educated filer or claimant in defiance of the FACT that the income
tax is an excise and cannot lawfully be applied as
any kind of non-apportioned direct tax, and the FACT that in
order to sustain an asserted tax against a filer who
has disputed it on his or her return in a consistent
and appropriate manner, as explained in CtC, the
tax-hungry government has to prove that the
activities which produced the targeted gains were
actually of the special variety liable to the tax.
Likewise, the Supreme Court has bitch-slapped every
federal district court which has acted as described above, and
every appellate court that has sustained any such ruling or any
Tax Court ruling of that sort. Again, likewise, the Supreme
Court has bitch-slapped any tax agency assertion that such
educated filings qualify for "frivolous return" penalties.
Any and all of the adverse judicial (or agency)
determinations described are manifestly fraudulent and abusive,
the product of raw corruption.
Remember, what the Supreme
Court has just said in Moore is only a re-iteration of
long-in-the-books black-letter law. That long-in-the-books,
black-letter law is knowable to anyone who went
to the trouble of looking, as I proved 21 years ago by going to
that trouble and publishing it all in
CtC.
It is especially knowable and, in fact, is KNOWN by any jurist or agency
officer to whom the information from CtC
has been presented as a
brief or in any other way. But many of these judges, who had
been left to
their own devices and had been unable to be schooled by a freshly-minted
re-iteration of the law such as that now offered up by the Moore
court, have been perfectly happy to behave badly, nonetheless.
IN MY OWN 2009 "trial" on accusations of not
believing what I wrote 21 years ago in
CtC, and which the
Supreme Court just re-iterated in Moore,
the outrageously corrupt judge, Gerald Rosen, upon hearing me articulate my
conclusions about the nature of the tax and cite to the
authorities on which they are based, actually announced with a
smirk of disdain to my jury that he, lawyer and judge and
graduate of law school, had never heard any such things.
(And the judge did so just prior to refusing a juror request to see
the actual words of statutes relevant to the case, and to which
I had referred in testimony. He then proceeded to give the jury
prosecution-written substitutes for that statutory language, from
which the acknowledgements of the excise-nature of the tax,
which had been built
to the statutory language in by the legislature, had been
removed and replaced with false language presenting the tax as a
non-apportioned capitation.)
It gets uglier still. The nonsense relied upon by
lower courts in tax cases over the years-- even most cases
involving
CtC-educated
Americans-- involves misrepresenting the Brushaber
decision as treating the income tax as a non-apportioned direct
tax rather than an excise. Still, some, or even most of the
judges in these cases, may actually not know any better and may
have simply relied on the precedents presented to them in
government briefs (while less forgivably ignoring the briefing
by the private citizen litigant).
But the judge initially cooperating with the
corrupt government efforts to suppress
CtC
by attacking me (and my wife, too, eventually)-- Nancy Edmunds--
did know the truth, or had every reason to, while
proceeding against us anyway.
This is evidenced by Edmund's deliberate
mischaracterization of
CtC
as arguing that only government workers are subject to the tax.
She treated that falsely-ascripted argument as the problem with
the book, rather than disputing and denouncing what the book
really says-- and which the Moore court has just
affirmed.
Edmund's only possible defense, it seems to me, is
that she simply, and improperly, took the word of the corrupt
DOJ operative who wrote that false-ascription, which she then
signed, despite it having been categorically disputed and
denounced under oath; despite her having never held a single
hearing in the case before issuing her ruling; and despite, as
she was later compelled to admit, never having even read
CtC.
HAPPILY, OF COURSE, AND ALL THE FOREGOING
NOTWITHSTANDING, most students of
CtC--
even though operating in this troubled, pre-Moore
environment-- have seemingly dealt with tax agency personnel who
DO know the truth. This has been steadily shown over the last
two decades+ by way of
the endless river
of refunds flowing out of state tax agencies and the IRS and into the
mailboxes and bank accounts of CtC-educated
filers and claimants.
But out of the hundreds of thousands of unmolested
victors, some educated filers have been harmed. Mostly this harm
has been modest in its practical effects, such as diversion of
acknowledged refunds owed back to the filer being diverted
against a pretended "frivolous return penalty" for another
filing (or even, sometimes, the same filing by which the refund
was secured!). Again, the practical harm in such cases is light,
but the crime is heinous nonetheless, involving as it does a
deep violation of the public trust, and being purely and
high-handedly abusive of its victims.
A handful have faced worse still, being accused of
filing forms they did not believe to be true.
I urge every victim of any of these crimes to
seek redress. Every victim should find competent legal
assistance (and share with counsel the voluminous tools
available here), or use those tools themselves and go solo.
FURTHER, EVERYONE, WITH A LEGAL GRIEVANCE OR NOT,
should consider how clear it lately is that the Leviathan state
has crossed the threshold into being a serious, imminent threat
to their well-being and that of those they love-- with no
recourse available through institutional checks. Starving the
beast is the only peaceful remedy remaining, and that can only
be practically done through individual action making use of
CtC's information and inspiration (see
this for more on that).
The Moore opinions have made deployment of
that remedy much smoother for the educated American, and much
more easily encouraged among others-- even people who would
previously never have dreamt of standing so tall and saying,
"NO!" so effectively.
All told, for political purposes as well
as for legal redress, Moore is a rare penetration of bright
sunlight through the fog usually maintained with great care around the subject
of the tax by a government that has grown fat and dangerous on
its too-rarely-challenged misrepresentations. It needs to be
used, and right now, while it is still fresh.
Seriously, my friends. Like every window of
opportunity, this one will only be open to its fullest extent
for a little while.
Don't miss it.
"It is not the function of our
Government to keep the citizen from falling into
error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the
Government from falling into error."
-United States Supreme Court Justice
Robert H. Jackson
"All governments are run by liars
and nothing they say should be believed."
--I. F. Stone
"A nation of sheep will beget a government of
wolves."
-Edward R. Murrow
P.P.S. Those interested in learning
more about the several Kangaroo "trials" through
which my wife Doreen and I have been put in
government efforts to suppress my work can do so
here.
P.P.P.S. My first article on the Moore
ruling can be found
here; my
second can be found
here.
Now, do you want this
article to make a difference? It only will
do so if YOU PASS IT ON TO OTHERS.
Please do that.
Use the permalink address
given above or below to post on social media. Or use the
"e-mail this article" link to send it to
someone else by that method.
Share these all, everywhere you can. Be your most
creative self in sending and "selling" these links. Do memes; make
gifs; respond to everything in the news that would be or have been
better had the state been small, or if Americans kept their money
for their own uses.
If you pay attention to the news and train yourself to
apply these perspectives, you will see a dozen things of which you
can make use in awakening other Americans to the virtues of having
the income tax correctly administered. Please, for my sake, for your
own sake, for the sake of your children and their future, make that
use.
IF YOU'RE NOT ALREADY GETTING THE NEWSLETTER delivered to your
email inbox, go to
this page
and subscribe to the group-- leave all options
in their default states.
YOU CAN ALSO usually find (and comment, share and repost) links to
new articles and posts on X
(click here
to follow me and receive the announcement posts).
If you choose the social media option (or use it in
addition to other means, as I wish you would), PLEASE get the full value out of
them by diligently "sharing" or "reposting" my posts! That will
significantly improve their
visibility to others, and very much help the cause!!
My RSS feed:
(Members of the
state CtC Warrior forums
in AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, IL, MI, MN, MO, NE, NY, NC, OH, OR, PA, SC,
TX, UT, VA, WA or WI, will continue to get the regular announcements
if the membership is set to receive email updates.)
NOTE: I will still not be engaging in
correspondence by
any of these alternative means-- those wishing to correspond with me should
continue to use direct email, as
specified here, for this purpose.
NOTE II: PLEASE help ensure that others in the
CtC community know about this change in newsletter delivery!!
*****
Not Letting This "Crisis" Go To Waste...
...an important action item opportunity.
FRIENDS, THE SPORADIC EASINGS of the despotic measures to
which most of the country has been subjected under
since the onset of the
COVID-19 hobgoblin narrative should not be
allowed to bleed off the head of steam you probably had been developing.
The offenses happened, and they're far from over. Stay hot.
And while you are all warmed up, and while others, if
they're smart, are just as hot, I'd like you to send an email (and
Facebook post, or whatever) with the following content to everyone you
can (with a request that they pass it along, in turn):
[Name], since March of 2020 you've
watched as over-fed state power has been used to literally destroy
classical Western civilization and impose a new despotic paradigm. No
dissent or debate permitted-- no permission or agreement sought.
YOU KNOW where this will end up if the arrogant
state power being used to make this happen isn't radically diminished in
size, influence, resources and popular support, and exposed as an
opportunistic exploiter of legal ignorance (an ignorance which it has
been nurturing in the average mind for decades).
Those things having not yet happened, you
should be quaking in your boots-- and you probably are.
Isn't it time-- and past time-- for you to
begin helping to make those desperately-needed defensive changes take
place? There is only one way these things can happen short of a
who-knows-what we'll-end-up-with explosion of violence. I'm going to
show it to you.
When you're done with that reading, you'll know
what to do next.
BTW, REMEMBER, ALSO, THAT EVERY AMERICAN has lately been given a stark lesson in the fact
that government officials at all levels will lie to you and violate the
law without batting an eye. They will do so any time it serves their agenda, and
you don't call them out for it.
If you know anyone who has been persisting in denial on the
truth about the income tax, you know such nonsense is usually be
grounded in some version or another of, "That can't be true..." or "They
would never do something like that...". Now's the time to put a pin in
that delusional bubble.
As the C19 hoax has starkly shown, "that" certainly CAN be true, and they
certainly WOULD do something
like that.
Use this evidence in all your
outreach efforts.
"It is not the function of our Government to keep the
citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to
keep the Government from falling into error."
-United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson
(Deceitful efforts to discourage Americans from
learning the truth about the "income tax")
FOR ALL THE YEARS SINCE 2003 when
CtC was first published, the government has engaged in a
concerted effort to frighten people away from its truths. This
effort involves official government websites and press releases
touting an occasional court ruling that appears to be at odds
with some
CtC-revelation (but without details sufficient to expose the
real substance of the ruling)--
and sometimes even more mendacious behavior.
Are the presentations and
resources offered on this site and in my other work of any value to you?
Tim Kendrick has posted
a video
on YouTube regarding donations. I didn't know what to do about
it to begin with; I don't do what I do intending for anyone to
feel obligated in any way.
But of course, no one IS obligated. I will continue
to make my work freely-available here, and in my books for only
the cost of a cheap paperback.
Thus, even though I post it here below, Tim's very
thoughtful personal resolution and encouragement to others is
just an invitation for consideration by those who may not be
conscious of the fact that I can't do what I do without support.
No one is to feel any pressure from it; if it moves anyone to
act let it be solely because it seems right.
All-in-all, just be the sort of person for others
that you would go to yourself for trustworthy leadership.
Leadership is a challenge. But it's not
complicated, and you can do it.
*****
Are You Having Trouble Spreading The
Word?
SKEPTICISM (SOMETIMES INVOKED BY FEAR) IS TO BE
EXPECTED when you're trying to explain to someone that
everything they've been encouraged their whole lives to
believe about something as entrenched and significant as the
income tax is basically nonsense. So here's a way to help
cut through the resistance:
Ask your listener how he or she would react if
you were to show an announcement from the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue admitting that the tax doesn't apply to the
earnings of most Americans and is misapplied most of the
time because people don't understand how it works? Or how
about if you showed a ruling from the Supreme Court saying
the same?
Now you just have to explain that
you're going to show exactly those things-- but because
the state really doesn't want people to know this, these
things haven't been said quite as forthrightly as we would
all wish. It's going to take a bit more work to take these
admissions in than is sufficient for just reading a press
release. But it'll be worth the effort...
IF YOU'RE NOT SPREADING THIS LINK with every bit of
energy you can, to school libraries, homeschool
families and community groups, your neighbors, your
family members, your pastors and
co-congregationalists, journalists, lawyers, CPAs,
members of congress, tax-agency workers, Wikipedia,
Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Tax Foundation, everyone
in the "tax honesty" movement, the 9/11 truth
movement, other activist movements and everyone
else,
you have only yourself to blame for your
troubles with the tax, and a whole lot else of which
you might complain. It's on you.
WRITE A NICE, FRIENDLY AND BRIEF introductory note
explaining what will be seen at the link-- cryptic
is bad; excited is good-- and then send this WMI
(weapon of mass instruction) far and wide.
Remember: Real Americans don't accommodate fog, lies and a sliding scale of
adherence to the rule of law. Real American men and women stand up for the
truth and the law, come what may, knowing that it is only by setting the bar
at the top and enforcing it, come what may, that liberties are secured.
"Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be
strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be
highly rated."
-Thomas Paine
OUTREACH!!!
JOB ONE, PEOPLE!!! SPREAD. THE. WORD.
ONLY ONE THING WILL WIN YOU YOUR LIBERTY:
Spreading the truth. Accordingly, I've assembled
outreach resources into a new, dedicated page. Find it
here, and please, USE THESE TOOLS!! I can't
do this all by myself.
"In a time of
universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary
act."
From September 11 to October
7: The Fake 'War on Terror' Collapses
For years, the US executed Israel’s
regional destabilization program using phantom
terrorists as justification for the ‘War on Terror.’
But 7 October 2023 killed Washington’s never-ending
war project – with a flip of the switch, US
adversaries have now turned the ‘Long War’ on
Israel.
by Pepe Escobar
Colonization … is the best
affair of business in which the capital of an old
and wealthy country can engage … the same rules of
international morality do not apply … between
civilized nations and barbarians.
– John Stuart Mill, quoted by Eileen
Sullivan in “Liberalism and Imperialism: JS Mill’s Defense of
the British Empire,” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 44,
1983.
The events of 11 September
2001 were intended to impose and enshrine a new
Exceptionalist paradigm on the young 21st century.
History, though, ruled otherwise.
Cast as an attack on the US
Homeland, 11 September 2001, immediately generated
the Global War on Terror (GWOT), launched at 11 pm
on the same day. Initially christened “The Long War”
by the Pentagon, the term was later sanitized by the
administration of Barack Obama as “Overseas
Contingency Operations (OCO).”
The US-manufactured War on
Terror spent a notoriously un-trackable eight
trillion dollars defeating a phantom enemy, killed over
half a million people – overwhelmingly Muslims –
and branched out into illegal wars against seven
Muslim-majority states. All of this was relentlessly
justified on “humanitarian grounds” and allegedly
supported by the “international community” – before
that term, too, was renamed as the “rules-based
international order.”
Cui Bono? (who
stands to gain) remains the paramount question
related to all matters related to 11 September
2001. A
tight network of fervently Israel-first neocons strategically
positioned across the defense and national security
establishments by Vice President Dick Cheney – who
had served as secretary of defense in the
administration of George W Bush’s father – sprang
into action to impose the long-planned
agenda of the Project for the New American
Century (PNAC). That far-reaching agenda had waited
in the wings for the right trigger – a “new Pearl
Harbor” – to justify a slew of regime-change
operations and wars across much of West Asia and
other Muslim states, reshaping global geopolitics
for the benefit of Israel.
US General Wesley Clark’s
notorious revelation of a secret Cheney regime plot to
destroy seven major Islamic countries over five
years, from Iraq, Syria, and Libya all the way
to Iran, showed us that the planning had already
been done in advance. These targeted nations had one
thing in common: they were resolute enemies of the
occupation state and firm supporters of Palestinian
rights.
The sweet deal, from Tel
Aviv’s perspective, was that the War on Terror would
have the US and its western allies fighting all
these serial Israeli-profiting wars on behalf of
“civilization” and against the “barbarians.” The
Israelis couldn’t have been more happy or smug about
the direction this was going.
It’s no wonder that 7
October 2023 is a mirror image of 11 September 2001.
The occupation state itself advertised this as
Israel’s own “11 September.” Parallels abound in
more ways than one, but certainly not in the way
Israel-firsters and the cabal of extremists leading
Tel Aviv expected.
Syria: the turning
point
The western Hegemon excels
in constructing narratives and is currently
wallowing in the Russophobia, Iranophobia, and
Sinophobia swamps of its own creation. Discrediting
official, immutable narratives, such as the one
about 11 September, remains the ultimate taboo.
But a false narrative construct cannot
hold out forever. Three years ago, on the
20th anniversary of the Twin Towers collapsing and the onset of
the War on Terror, we witnessed a great unraveling in the
intersection of Central and South Asia: the Taliban were back in
power, celebrating their victory over the Hegemon in a
discombobulated Forever War.
By then, the “seven
countries in five years” obsession – aiming to forge
a “New Middle East” – was being derailed across the
spectrum. Syria was the turning point, though some
would argue that the tea leaves were already cast
when the Lebanese resistance defeated Israel in
2000, then again in 2006.
But smashing independent
Syria would have paved the way for the Hegemon – and
Israel’s – Holy Grail: regime change in Iran.
US occupation forces entered Syria in
late 2014 under the pretext of fighting “terror.” That was
Obama’s OCO in action. In reality, though, Washington was using
two key terror outfits – Daesh, aka ISIL, aka ISIS, and Al
Qaeda, aka Jabhat al-Nusra, aka Hayat Tahrir al-Sham – to try to
destroy Damascus.
That was conclusively proved by a
declassified 2012 US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document,
later confirmed by General Michael Flynn, the DIA’s chief when
the assessment was written: “I think it was a willful decision
[by the Obama administration]” when it comes to helping, not
fighting, terror.
ISIS was conceived to fight both the
Iraqi and Syrian armies. The terror group was an offspring of
Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), then renamed Islamic State in Iraq
(ISI), then rebranded as ISIL, and finally ISIS, after it
crossed the Syrian border in 2012.
The crucial point is that both ISIS and
Nusra Front (later Hayat Tahrir al-Sham) were hardcore Salafi-jihadi
Al-Qaeda offshoots.
Russia entering the Syrian theater at
Damascus’ invitation in September 2015 was the real
game-changer. Russian President Vladimir Putin decided to
actually engage in a real war on terror in Syrian territory
before that terror reached the Russian Federation’s borders.
This was captured by the standard formulation in Moscow at the
time: the distance from Aleppo to Grozny is only 900 kilometers.
The Russians, after all, had already
been subjected to the same brand and modus operandi of terror in
Chechnya in the 1990s. Afterward, many Chechen jihadis escaped,
only to end up joining dodgy outfits in Syria financed by the
Saudis.
The late, great Lebanese analyst Anis
Naqqash later confirmed that it was the legendary Iranian Quds
Force Commander Qassem Soleimani who convinced Putin, in person,
to enter the Syrian theater of war and help defeat the
terrorism. This strategic masterplan, it transpires, was to
fatally debilitate the US in West Asia.
The US security establishment, of
course, would never forgive Putin, and especially Soleimani, for
defeating their handy jihadist foot soldiers. On the orders of
President Donald Trump, the anti-ISIS Iranian general was
assassinated in Baghdad in January 2020, alongside Abu Mahdi al-Mohandes,
deputy leader of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Units (PMUs), a
broad spectrum of Iraqi fighters who had coalesced to defeat
ISIS in Iraq.
ESCOBAR DOES A NICE JOB concisely laying out the history
and (often hidden) dynamics underlying US motivations and behavior in
the Middle East and towards Russia throughout this century. What he
provides is highly important in understanding current events on the
foreign policy front (and to a more limited degree, the domestic
political front, as well).
All-in-all, its a pretty shabby tale. Worse, its a
tale the shabbiness of which must be a shame borne by most
Americans, even those with no connection to the policy-making
elite. This is because as much as people like to imagine
themselves powerless to effect such matters, most Americans have
been quietly funding the death of every Iraqi, Libyan, Syrian,
Lebanese, Afghani and Palestinian man, woman and child killed by
military violence over the last twenty-two years (and all such
deaths in Ukraine, as well).
The shame needn't go on though, for any particular
person. Especially now, with the US Supreme Court
having just reaffirmed its 108-year-old ruling
in Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR. Co.,
acknowledging the truth about the income tax
revealed in
CtC...
The arising and sustenance of
the Leviathan state monster used-- directly and
indirectly-- to wreak all the death and destruction
in the Middle East and Eastern Europe is a direct result of
the successful mis-administration of the US income
tax laws. This began primarily in the early 1940s with the
adoption of the Current Tax Payment Act of 1943
amidst the tumult of WWII, and after a couple of
decades of corrupt misrepresentation of the 16th
Amendment's purpose and effect, despite that
misrepresentation being squarely in defiance of
the
history of the amendment and multiple express Supreme
Court rulings on the subject.
Shrinking that
Leviathan state monster merely involves the
reversing of that misadministration-- something that
can be done by individual Americans, acting
one-by-one, with no help or approval of any
government official. Each such act makes use of
state-restraining tools baked into the
Constitutional cake by the Founders and Framers, and
each such act WILL make a difference, however small.
Most important, each such act will absolve the actor
from the dishonor of participation in the heinous
crimes their resources would otherwise finance.
All that is required is some knowledge
(which can be gotten
here),
and some courage-- the latter of which naturally
blooms in the hearts of real Americans when given
the nourishment of the former. As the saying goes,
America is the Land of the Free because it is the
Home of the Brave.
You can find all of this
explained
here, along with links to some additional
relevant resources.
Read that material, and then become an
agent of change. Urge everyone you know to do both
of these things, as well.
Seriously, people. It's time to stop
whistling past the graveyard and start using the
powerful and important tools with which our wise
ancestors equipped us.
P.S. DO YOU WANT THIS
ARTICLE to make a difference? It only will
do so if YOU PASS IT ON TO OTHERS.
Please do that.
Use the permalink address
below to post on social media. Or use the
"e-mail this article" link to send it to
someone else by that method.
EVEN AS ARDENT A STATIST as Abraham
Lincoln, in announcing his willingness to burn the Southern states to the ground in order to
keep them paying the tariff for the benefit of Northern interests in
his first inaugural address on March 4, 1861, paid at least lip
service to the Founders design of leaving control over the fuel
available to feed the fires Washington wants to light in the hands
of the individual citizenry when he said, "Doing this I deem to
be only a simple duty on my part; and I shall perform it, unless my
rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite
means..."
Lawyers:
It's Way Past Time For You All To Queue Up!
[Y]ou really need to familiarize yourself with Pete
Hendrickson's absolutely magnificent work at his website and in
his book(s). He has, brilliantly and lucidly, "cracked the
code" regarding the federal income EXCISE tax(es)."
-Mark C. Phillips, JD
"...I find your work fascinatingly simple to understand."
-Jerry Arnowitz, JD
"Your book is a masterpiece!"
-Michael Carver, JD
"Received your book yesterday. Started reading at 11
PM, finished at 4 AM." "I have 16 feet (literally 16'
4.5") of documents supporting just about everything in your
book." "Your book should be required reading for every lawyer
before being admitted to any Bar." "I hope you sell a
million of them."
-John O'Neil Green, JD
�Thanks again for your efforts, Pete. They mean an awful lot
to a lot of people.� ��as an attorney, I am humbled by your
knowledge and ability in navigating the law. THANK YOU for
your hard work and sacrifice.�
-Eric Smithers, JD
"I am an attorney and want to give a testimonial to your
book, which I find to be compelling. I am exercising these
rights for myself and my adult children. I'm even considering
making this my new avenue of law practice."
-Nancy "Ana" Garner, JD
Learn what these colleagues already know, then step forward and
become part of a coordinated, mutually-supportive squadron
focused on developing strategy and deploying the law in
courtrooms across the country. There's a lot of suing that
needs doing right now.
Are you ready for a challenge that'll put some real meaning
behind all the effort you went through to get your credentials?
Send me an email.
*****
Are You Ready For More Power?
"Peter Hendrickson has done it again! 'Upholding The
Law' does for individual liberties what 'Cracking the Code' did
for tax law compliance: exposes the reader to the unalienable
truth!"
-Jesse Herron, Bill Of Rights Press, Fort Collins, Colorado
Do you
know someone truly steeped in the Kool-Aid?
I mean
someone who finds it easier to believe that the far-better-educated,
far-more-suspicious-of-government Americans of a hundred years ago were
complete morons who granted authority to the state to take whatever it
wished from themselves and their posterity than to imagine that they
themselves simply misunderstand the true nature of the income tax? Even
while knowing that their beliefs about the tax are derived entirely from
the representations of those who profit from those beliefs (like tax
bureaucrats and "tax professionals")?
Do you
know someone like that? Shake them awake with the latest (sixteenth)
edition of
CtC!
If
CtC were actually
right, it would mean the government's been concealing and
denying and suppressing the truth for years
on end, and everybody knows THAT would never happen...
(Edward Snowden, come home! It was all just a bad dream; there really is
No Such Agency!)
Btw, a copy of
CtC from anywhere except the link above may not
be a current edition. CHECK. It matters. Also, there ARE no
e-book, Kindle or .pdf versions of
CtC.
Don't get taken in by efforts to sell you-- or even give you for
free-- any such thing.
October 15- In 1878, the Edison
Electric Company begins operations. In 1917, Dutch dancer Mata Hari is executed
by France as a German spy. In 1940, Charlie Chaplin's 'The Great Dictator' is
released. In 1971, Iran begins its 2500th Birthday celebration.
*****
A Few Words About "Climate Change" Fraud
You NEED to defend yourself and your kids against this
now-high-inertia effort to destroy liberty.
H/T to Jonesy for circulating this fun little meme and video link.
*****
Hey! If you're not getting the newsletter delivered
to your email inbox every Monday, go to
this link
and subscribe to the group-- leave all options in their default states.
October 16- In 1775, Portland, Maine is burned by the British.
In 1781, the Continental Army captures Yorktown, Virginia. In 1793, Marie
Antoinette is guillotined. In 1875, Brigham Young University is founded in
Provo, Utah. In 1964, China conducts its first successful nuclear weapon test.
In 1969, George Hennard entered a restaurant in Luby, Texas, and killed 23
patrons and wounded another 20 before committing suicide. The incident led to
the adoption by the Texas legislature of the "shall issue" principle in regard
to CCW applications, a reversal of the policy blamed for the fact that no one in
the restaurant but Hennard had a weapon that day.
*****
A Two-Minute Review Of CtC
David Bindel reminds us that there's either the rule of law, or
there isn't.
HEY! SAYING IT AGAIN!! DON'T YOU WISH YOUR INSPIRING
BEING-THE-STORM VIDEO was posted? This is easy to do, and very important
(plus it can get you some great LHC swag!). See
(and carefully read)
these guidelines and encouragements.
Every victim of the "ignorance tax", 'cause it's all
just statist consent-engineering propaganda.
*****
Hey, Gamers!
WAKEN TO THE REAL-LIFE ADVENTURE IN WHICH YOU
ARE UNKNOWINGLY IMMERSED! Put down your controller and
listen!
You are surrounded by an actual battle between
villains, monsters and true heroes, all simply concealed
from you by
sophisticated spells which also keep you from
engaging in the fight.
There are real great deeds to be done,
and real treasures to be had for your efforts, and
frankly, your real future
is at stake. You just have to gain "the sight" in order to
penetrate the illusions.
Visit
losthorizons.com to get the counter-spells and get onto
the real field of battle!
*****
PRO TIP: If I were the IRS and I wanted to
discourage people from rebutting allegations that
they had done things I can tax, and wanted to keep them from
successfully reclaiming withheld or paid-in money, I
would salt the "tax honesty" community with
passionate-seeming "legal researchers" who would
warn anyone whose ear they captured that filing a
1040 is a bad idea for one reason or another...
*****
Illuminating Anniversaries of this week:
October 17- In 1781, British General Cornwallis offers his
surrender to the Continental Army at Yorktown, Virginia. In 1814, beer vats in
a brewery in London, England, burst, flooding the streets with more than 323,000
gallons of beer. There are nine casualties-- 8 by drowning, and one by alcohol
poisoning. In 1907, the first commercial transatlantic wireless service
commences. In 1931, Al Capone is convicted of "income" tax evasion. In 1956,
the first commercial nuclear power station opens in Cumbria, England. In 1979,
the U.S. Department of Education is created. In 2023, Israel conducts one of
the first hospital bombings of its genocide in Gaza, killing several hundred
Palestinians in the process.
If you're not talking this one up everywhere and
helping generate a buzz, you don't really want liberty and the
rule of law...
*****
In light of
the actual evidence, those
who doubt or
deny the accuracy and correctness of
CtC just because some government officials
denounce it are like the 16th-century Europeans who
were mystified by
Copernicus getting all those
astronomical predictions right even though the
church had said he was wrong.
*****
Did you miss the 'Set Your Church Free'
commentaries?
Ignorance of the true nature of the "income" tax
has gagged, gutted and seduced-into-disgrace America's
ministerial community. This must change.
*****
You're a
passenger on a riverboat that relies on regular
contributions of fuel from the passengers to
keep moving forward. You see an unsurvivable
waterfall ahead, and note a
soon-to-be-irresistible current growing stronger
each day. What does common sense suggest?
*****
Test Your
"Income" Tax IQ!
CtC Warrior
SanDiegoScott has put together a great little 20-question quiz
to test your knowledge of the law regarding the United States
"income" tax. Test yourself, test your friends and family!
Test your accountant and tax attorney, and help them learn the
liberating truth!!
October 18- In 1867, the United States takes possession
of Alaska after buying it from Russia for 2 cents an acre. In 1898, the
United States is ceded "legal" possession of Puerto Rico by Spain as a
consequence of the Spanish-American War. In 1954, Texas Instruments
introduces the transistor radio.
*****
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a
people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power
which knowledge gives."
"It is not the function of our Government to keep
the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the
citizen to keep the Government from falling into error."
-United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson
October 19- In 1935, the League of Nations imposes economic
sanctions on Italy over its invasion of Ethiopia. In 1943, the first
antibiotic treatment for tuberculosis is isolated in a lab. In 1960, the
United States imposes an embargo on Cuba. In 1973, the Nixon Whitehouse
defies an appeals court order to turn over the Watergate tapes. In 1987, a
world-wide stock-market crash begins in Hong Kong and spreads throughout the
world. The Dow Jones Industrial Average falls by 22.6% that day (Black
Monday)-- several major markets lose more than 40% of their value, with New
Zealand's losing 60% . In 2005, Saddam Hussein goes on trial in Baghdad for
"crimes against humanity".
*****
*****
'The BOSTONIAN'S Paying the EXCISE-MAN, or
TARRING & FEATHERING' (1774) (How our forefathers responded to arrogant
"Rule of Law defiers"...)
*****
The willingness of some people to trade liberty for
convenience is without limit...
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed,
second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
-Arthur
Schopenhauer
*****
Illuminating Anniversaries of this week:
October 20- In 1803, the U.S. Senate
ratifies the Louisiana Purchase. In 1947, the House Un-American Activities
Committee begins its investigation of communist infiltration of Hollywood. In
1955, 'The Return Of The King', the last book in Tolkien's 'Lord Of The Rings'
trilogy, is published. In 1973, the "Saturday Night Massacre" takes place, with
Richard Nixon firing Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney
General William Ruckelshaus after they refuse to fire Watergate prosecutor
Archibald Cox, who is finally fired by Robert Bork. In 2011, Moammar Ghaddafi
was killed as part of a United States coup intended to thwart Chinese
investments and development of oil interests in Libya, as well Ghaddafi's move
toward eliminating the US dollar as the sole currency accepted for oil sales.
*****
Last Word
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude
greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We
seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that
feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget
that ye were our countrymen."
-Samuel
Adams, Architect of the first American Revolution
OK, Now Back To Your Regularly Scheduled Programming:
Is this newsletter of any value to you? If so, please
consider a donation
to help keep it available, or it soon won't be. Donations can
be sent to:
Hendrickson is also a widely-read essayist on
matters of politics, public policy and law; many of these works
are collected in his second book, �Upholding
the Law And Other Observations�. He is a member of Mensa;
an
award-winning artist; and has paid his dues as a youth
soccer coach. He is a long-time political activist as well, and
has served as co-chair and platform convention delegate of
Michigan�s largest county Libertarian Party organization; as a
consultant to the National Right to Work Foundation and Citizens
for a Sound Economy; as a member of the Heartland Institute; and
as a member of the International Society for Individual
Liberty. He is a frequent radio-show guest on stations across
the country.
Hendrickson's business career has included nearly a
decade-and-a-half at the leading edge of the renewable-energy
industry, both as Director of Purchasing and Materials
Management and member of the R&D board at Starpak Energy
Systems, the mid-west's then-largest solar heating and
energy-recovery-and re-utilization company; and as founder and
president of AFJ Inc., a high-efficiency lighting design,
manufacture and installation firm.
Beginning in the mid-1990s and continuing for the
twelve years before his present full-time focus on the
restoration of the rule of law in America, Hendrickson directed
purchasing activities for the $84 million-a-year
multi-family-housing division of the Farmington Hills, Michigan
branch of Edward Rose and Sons, with responsibility for 18,000+
apartments, direct supervision of 35 technicians and agents, and
incidental authority over several hundred divisional workers.
He also ran the division's 10 cable television earth-station and
distribution systems in four states, and designed and
administered the company's website.
On rather the other end of the spectrum, amidst
these more mundane pursuits Hendrickson co-founded and was the
primary creative force behind a small
board- and
card-game company that enjoyed a modest success for several
years.
Hendrickson makes his home in southeast Michigan,
with his wife and two children. He is currently working on his
next book.
� All written and graphic material on this page and
website are copyrighted by Peter E. Hendrickson, unless otherwise attributed.