The Lost Horizons Forum

A meeting place for the CtC-empowered.
It is currently Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:25 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 6:03 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:49 am
Posts: 173
The November 8, 2021 Lost Horizons Newsletter
...where real knowledge-- and actual solutions-- intersect with real Americans!

A Thoughtful And Persuasive Rejection Of mRNA "Vaccines"
As resistance to the "vaccine" scam widens and deepens, a very articulate voice is added to the conversation from a place where this sort of narrow-eyed consideration might not have been expected, and which is all the more welcome and significant for that reason.

"There is no safety for honest men but by believing all possible evil of evil men."
-Edmund Burke

CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANÒ has recently shared a letter he sent October 23, 2021 to Cardinal Luis F. Ladaria S.J., Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishop José Gomez, President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, as well as to all the bishops of the United States of America. Viganò presents a carefully reasoned, heavily supported argument against the mRNA "vaccines" being pushed on the American people and others around the world with a manic and relentless ferocity-- despite the long-standing and ever-growing evidence of their worthlessness as remedies against C19 and of their significant adverse effects.

I've reproduced the letter, with its voluminous supporting footnotes, below, and will follow it with some comments. Please read Viganò's presentation in its entirety, and don't be put off by it beginning with some discussion of a position taken by the Catholic church in a December 21, 2020 'Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines (sic)' (which is an addition to the Vatican's document collection known as the 'Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith' and which focuses on the question of taking vaccines or "vaccines" developed with the use of tissues from non-spontaneously-aborted babies).

Viganò's references to the earlier 'Note' is to distinguish his letter, the primary focus of which is on the practical realities of the "vaccines" and the moral considerations arising from those practical aspects themselves-- considerations which apply with equal force regardless of one's views of the use of aborted fetal tissue in the development and manufacture of the "vaccines".

Here is the letter:



Comments In Brief
Short takes on selected items lately in the news, such as "reparations" for illegal immigrants, gender assignment, quirks in last week's election reporting, and more.

THE BIDEN REGIME'S systematic attack on America has taken another bizarre turn with the proposition of "reparation" payments to illegal immigrants who were separated from the children they irresponsibly brought with them when crossing the national border. The storyline is that such separations were somehow unprecedented and tortious.

But neither of these propositions is true. People being incarcerated pursuant to criminal charges NEVER have their children put in the jail cell with them. The idea is insane, and to have incarcerated the innocent children in the detention facilities with their charged parents is what would have been legitimately tortious.

Likewise, the story that the Justice Department (sic) is floating-- that the (originally $450,000 per adult illegal involved, now morphing into a different, as-yet-unstated alternative figure) "reparation" payment is a "settlement". This bs is a contrived rationale meant to suggest that Biden & crew are protecting the rest of us from a higher obligation if these ridiculous claims went to trial.

In fact, call me a cynic, but I suspect that the very idea of "claims" on the matter was dreamed up by someone in the Biden camp itself, and then proposed to the supposed "victims"...



Other Voices (followed by an important afterword)

"The Public Good" Isn't Mark Zuckerberg's-- Or Congress's-- Priority
by Thomas L. Knapp

Facebook “whistleblower” Frances Haugen, the Washington Post reports, has “repeatedly accused [Facebook CEO Mark] Zuckerberg of choosing growth over the public good.” The Post‘s headline puts it a slightly different way: “Growth over safety.”

The meaning of “growth” in this context is pretty obvious: Zuckerberg’s company makes a lot of money, and he wants it to make even more.

The meaning of “safety” is somewhat more nebulous. Facebook spokeswoman Dani Lever refers to “difficult decisions between free expressions and harmful speech, security and other issues” before going to a place that should chill the blood of anyone listening:

“Drawing these societal lines is always better left to elected leaders which is why we’ve spent many years advocating for Congress to pass updated Internet regulations.”

The Post story opens with a more accurate account of what Lever proposes:



Illuminating Anniversaries For This Week!


"I confidently trust that the American people will prove themselves...too wise not to detect the false pride or the dangerous ambitions or the selfish schemes which so often hide themselves under that deceptive cry of mock patriotism: 'Our country, right or wrong!' They will not fail to recognize that our dignity, our free institutions and the peace and welfare of this and coming generations of Americans will be secure only as we cling to the watchword of true patriotism: 'Our country--when right to be kept right; when wrong to be put right.'"
-Senator Carl Schurz, October 17, 1899

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group