|
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Forty-One Tens of thousands of readers of 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America' have taken control of their own resources, in accordance with, and respect for, the law. The likely total amount reclaimed by these good Americans so far is upward of several billion dollars.
A few of these good American men and women-- such as those honored below-- are generous enough to send me the evidence of their victories in upholding the law, for the edification and inspiration of everyone. At the moment those shared refund checks, closing notices, and so forth total:
Bill Harding
Enjoy Bill's federal refund for 2008 above on this page, and his 2005 Michigan refund here, his 2006 Michigan refund here, and his 2008 Michigan refund here.
B. H.
William
Tina
Lowell and Joan Thompson
From this:
to this:
See Episode XXXIII of the 'Every Which Way But Loose' collection for the details on this victory, and click here to see the Thompson's federal victory for 2006.
Clyde Johnson
The return leading to this report can be seen here.
H&M Analytic Services, Inc.
This refund resulted after H&MAS filed a 941 correction containing this declaration as to its previous mischaracterized payments as "wages" and explanation as to why its payments to workers DON'T qualify as "wages" (which also holds forth a bit on the subject of U.S. territorial jurisdiction, something relevant to the issue of when a corporation qualifies as having been "incorporated under the laws of the United States", and when one does not).
Anon.
The "adjustment" indicated involves the IRS "misunderstanding" discussed here (which the acknowledgement of the correct AGI makes clear is arrant nonsense...).
Dave and Kimberlie Kessel
The filing involved here was complicated by the issue discussed here (while the acknowledgement of the correct AGI makes clear that the 'service' did Dave and Kimberlie a DIS-service by not correcting this on their behalf and returning ALL their property...).
Daniel
Gotta love this... An 'overpayment' credited to the same year for which it is acknowledged... This is much like Daniel's last victory... Watch out for that robot! I THINK IT'S GOING TO EXPLODE!!
John Sytsma
Enjoy John's federal victories for 2006 and 2008 here; his federal victory for 2007 here; and his federal victory for 2009 here.
Click here to return to the Bulletin Board
Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog still tries to play its losing hand occasionally. Ironically, it is these sporadic spasms of resistance that offer the most telling evidence of the truth about the tax...
Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption. Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all. “God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.” -Daniel Webster
NOTE: Whether any given individual is entitled to a refund depends on a number of different factors, and no one should presume that they are so entitled simply because they see that others are. Each person should educate himself or herself about the particulars of the law, and make his or her own determination in this regard. |
To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.
The First Complete "Income" Tax-Related Refund (Social Security, Medicare And All) Ever Received
An "Income" Tax Subject Site Map
A Few Words About Tax "Reform"
NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned.
When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.
