More Victories 27

The refunds reflected in the following checks and notices include EVERYTHING-- Social Security 'contributions' and all-- which was withheld from the private-sector earnings of these upstanding Americans during the relevant years, unless otherwise indicated. These good folks learned the truth, and then simply, and courageously, insisted on lawful behavior from their servant government.

(Actually, this is only the total of the checks and notices I have been sent for posting. Adding what has been merely reported to me would raise the figure a great deal; no doubt the actual overall total of what has been received by readers-- including those who have not shared the news-- is much higher still.)

R. and Y. Sauzedde

Brian R. _

Brian's refund-so-far, by amended return, is of everything withheld from him as nominal "federal income tax". Brian is still waiting for the return of amounts withheld as 'Social Security and Medicare taxes' during that year, which were excluded from this check despite the plain acknowledgement (by way of this partial refund) that Brian had not received any of the "wages" by which 'Social Security and Medicare tax' obligations arise and are measured...

William Barnes

(This is a composite of three separate pages.)

Bill had inadvertently failed to claim his personal exemption on his return-- the IRS helpfully applied it and reduced Bill's tax accordingly. Click here to see the relevant docs.

Joseph Mattheeussen

Chris and Shelly Reile

Click here to see Chris and Shelly's individual 2005 New York victories; click here to enjoy their joint 2006 victory.

Shimone Canty

See Shimone's 2005 Georgia victory here; and his 2006 federal victory here.

Chris McHugh

Dennis and Antoinette

(2005)

George _

(George reports earnings for these years of over $100,000.00)

Lynne Gardner

Tim Davis

Chris Huminski

Chris got this in February:

He responded with this:

Chris included a strongly worded letter making clear that he was standing by the testimony on his filed 1040 and his 1099 rebuttal (copies of which were attached):

Nonetheless, the IRS proceeded to issue this:

Chris made an irate phone call to the tax agency, and afterward sent me the following email:

Pete:

Guess what?
That damn notice of deficiency letter they just sent was a computer generated letter that was sent BEFORE anybody considered the response letter I sent to their cp2000 letter.

The guy on the phone at the GA center told me that they will get that letter in a few days and get back to me.

And so they did...

Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog is still trying to play its losing hand in a few cases-- particularly where amended returns, in which the filer necessarily disputes his or her own previous testimony, are concerned. Significantly, not once in any of these efforts to discourage or stonewall a proper filing does the government actually challenge or dispute the accuracy of what is revealed in 'Cracking the Code-...'

Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption. Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all.

“God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”

To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.

NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned.

When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.