Games - Artwear - Wisdom Wall Art - Stationery - HomeschoolingDon't Tread On Me - Income Tax Truth - Comment - Home

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seven

The refunds reflected in the following checks and notices include EVERYTHING-- Social Security 'contributions' and all-- which was withheld from the private-sector earnings of these upstanding Americans during the relevant years, unless otherwise indicated.  These good folks learned the truth, and then simply, and courageously, insisted on lawful behavior from their servant government.

Total retained or refunded so far:

(Actually, this is only the total of the checks and notices I have been sent for posting.  Adding what has been merely reported to me would raise the figure a great deal; no doubt the actual overall total of what has been received by readers-- including those who have not shared the news-- is much higher still.)

 

Ira Paulk

 

 


 

D. _

 

 

Click here to see D.'s 2005 Utah victory.

 


 

Kari J.

 

 

This is a 'Dazed and Confused' refund, of the sort discussed here.

 


 

D. S.

 

 


 

John Moffo

 

 


 

Jeff Makeeff

 

 

To see the docs associated with this refund, click here.

(You'll notice that Jeff acknowledges some "income" on these docs: His earnings from a part-time job at the Post Office.)

 


 

Laura Johnson

 

 

Click here to see the docs associated with this refund

 

 

Click here to see the docs associated with this refund

 

(It will be observed that some "income" is reported on both sets of Laura's docs.  She says, "Unfortunately, I didn't have time to study the tax laws about alimony..., ...or my refunds might have been much bigger." )

 

Click here to see the docs associated with this refund-in-progress, which is of the kind discussed here.

 


 

Troy _

 

Troy points out that all but $24 of this refund consists of taxes withheld as Social Security and Medicare 'contributions'.  The docs Troy filed can be seen here.

Carolyn _

 

The docs associated with this refund can be seen here.

 


Philip and Ecco Stambaugh

 


 

Brent C.

 

 

 

 

After Brent corrected the relevant information returns as to "wages" paid by his small business, the IRS promptly acknowledged the resulting changes in taxes owed for each of the three quarters of 2002 during which Brent's company had done business, and followed up the next day with these three refund checks. 

 


 

Amanda M.

 

 


 

G. T.

 

This refund concerns withholding from only one month's earnings-- the rest of the year G. T. worked for himself and was made the subject of a number of 1099s but no additional withholding.  The California DOR transcript associated with this refund can be seen here.

...and from the feds:

 


 

Steve _

 

This is a complete refund of what had been given to the federal government for "income" taxes during 2004-- which was sent in by Steve himself with his automatic extension request.  Subsequently, Steve learned the truth about the law...

 

...and then the IRS argued with him-- briefly-- as indicated here...

 

...leading to this:

 

 

Click here to enjoy Stephen's victory for 2003

 


 

Mitchell Baldwin

 

 

Apparently, it took a little while for Utah to sort all of Mitchell's relevant filings, because it wasn't until a month after this first refund notice issued that the following showed up in his mailbox:

 

 

 


 

Daniel and Judith Sapon-Borson

 

 

The documents associated with both of these refunds can be seen here.


 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page One

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Two

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Three

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Four

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Five

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Six

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eight

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nine

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Ten

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eleven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twelve

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Thirteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fourteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fifteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Sixteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seventeen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eighteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nineteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twenty

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyOne

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyTwo

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyThree

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFour

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFive

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentySix

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentySeven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyEight

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyNine

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Thirty

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyOne

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyTwo

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyThree

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyFour

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyFive

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtySix

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtySeven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyEight

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyNine

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Forty

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page FortyOne

 

Victory Highlights

 


 

Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog is still trying to play its losing hand in a few cases-- particularly where amended returns, in which the filer necessarily disputes his or her own previous testimony, are concerned.  Significantly, not once in any of these efforts to discourage or stonewall a proper filing does the government actually challenge or dispute the accuracy of what is revealed in 'Cracking the Code-...'

 

Click here for more...

 


 

Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption.  Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all.  

 

“God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”

-Daniel Webster

 

NOTE: Whether any given individual is entitled to a refund depends on a number of different factors, and no one should presume that they are so entitled simply because they see that others are.  Each person should educate himself or herself about the particulars of the law, and make his or her own determination in this regard.

 

To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.

 

See what readers have to say about 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America'

The First Complete "Income" Tax-Related Refund (Social Security, Medicare And All) Ever Received

An "Income" Tax Subject Site Map

A Few Words About Tax "Reform"

Click Here to Crack the Code

Use the "Back" button on your browser to return to the previous page

NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned. 

When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.