Home | News | Site Map | Search | Contact

How Do You Know When The State Is Lying?

An old joke, but in regard to this deceiver, not a laughing matter at all.

RECENTLY I WROTE THIS OBSERVATION concerning the patently-obvious false-flag* ascription to Bashar al Assad's government of the tragic massacre by chemical weapons of some 87 people in a small town in northern Syria on April 4, 2017:

OVERTHROWING THE ASSAD REGIME IN SYRIA has been a Deep State wish-list item for years. Assad knows this, and he knows that his use of chemical weapons would be just the pretext needed for ending any even-handedness toward him by the Trump administration.

There's no way Assad was responsible for the use of chemical weapons in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria, last week. Not a chance.

Not only would doing so be hugely counter-productive, but it would also be pointless. Assad has been steadily winning for quite some time now against the US-backed extremists trying to take over Syria, and he doesn't need to resort to desperate measures that involve spitting in the eye of the hyper-power which has been itching for any excuse to come in and reverse things.

ON THE OTHER HAND, Rex Tillerson and Nikki Haley announced just the week before this chemical attack that Trump intends to leave Assad in power. That is, Tillerson and Haley told the Deep State and its "rebel" Islamic-extremist proxies in Syria that they were going to be thwarted in their ambitions unless something happened to dramatically change the status quo.

It is obvious to any but the willfully or mendaciously blind that the Deep State and its "rebel" Islamic-extremist proxies are the only folks for whom the use of chemical weapons in Syria offers any benefit, which is had by accusing Assad of responsibility and forcing Trump to turn against him. In fact, it is obvious that these folks were just as much compelled to use such weapons in a false-flag sham as Assad was disinclined to use such weapons.


At a minimum, the event consisted of Syrian air-strikes unknowingly dispersing "rebel"-stockpiled chemical weapons, an alternative possibility for which the Deep State and its proxies would also be fully responsible and which also may well rise to a war crime. No wonder these folks have undertaken an immediate and intense effort to turn all eyes onto Assad and to agitate all observers out of any thoughtful consideration of the event and any measured investigation which would reveal where culpability really lies.

THE OBVIOUSNESS OF THESE POINTS is so glaring that any US official and any journalist who fails to acknowledge them must be seen as deliberately deceptive.

More, the failure of President Trump to acknowledge these glaringly-obvious points, and his sudden reversal of position on Assad and embrace of the Deep State goals on the basis of this transparently false pretext must be seen as an indication that Trump has been captured by the Deep State and is now its puppet (or always has been, while playing a role in a seriously-sophisticated charade).

This is all shameful, disgraceful and corrupt.

Americans would be well-advised to be alert and awake right now.

“Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied; and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people. The same malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of a state of war, and in the degeneracy of manners and of morals engendered by both. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.”

-James Madison

This might be a good time to review

The Founders Defense Against Sociopaths In Office

SINCE I POSTED THE WORDS ABOVE, the Trump administration has attacked Syria with cruise missiles, bombarding the airfield from which planes involved in last week's incident were launched. This, without a scintilla of evidence that Assad had anything to do with the chemical event (and no effort to find any), and in the face of every rational certainty that he did not.

This "retaliation" without investigation simply confirms the false flag character of the event. No one would do such a thing except in service to an agenda in which the facts are irrelevant because the place at which things arrive was pre-determined.

GETTING AMERICA EMBROILED IN SYRIA with American planes and American pilots (and soon infantry) in harm's way and set up to produce a few bloody shirts so as to make the commitment irrevocable, appears to be the plan. This must now be seen as necessary to accomplish the overthrow of Assad that has been the wish-list item all along.

The fact has always been that Assad is very popular in Syria, having followed in his father's footsteps with a relatively benign secular government, which welcomed and protected all religious sects, including Christians as well as Muslims. An externally-driven assault has been the only way of removing him.

Since Assad and the Russians have been winning against the CIA-proxy "rebels" lately, and in a big way, American boots on the ground are now needed. This, in turn, needed a pretext, like an inexplicable but rushed-to-judgment "chemical attack". Sort of a Syria-oriented "new Pearl Harbor", as it were..

I TITLED THIS ARTICLE with a reference to an old joke about knowing when someone is lying. It happens that just four days ago was the anniversary of the embroilment of America in World War I, in large part by way of another false flag event. Please familiarize yourself with that earlier deception, and then think long and hard about how you're being played today.

And while you're having that think, keep this other oldie but goodie in mind: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.


*False flag, def:  A deliberate false ascription of responsibility for some heinous event-- whether involving false "evidence" or not-- which is meant to induce popular support for some kind of "retaliatory", "defensive" or "punitive" action usually (but not necessarily) of a military nature.